Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24122459›Full record

ReviewBiopolymers2013

Antimicrobial hydrogels for the treatment of infection.

Ana Salomé Veiga, Joel P Schneider

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biopolymers, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An Overview of Wound Dressing Materials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Salomé VeigaInde Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joel P Schneider
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Design and Utility of Novel Protienaceous BiomaterialsZIABC011313 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHNEIDER, JOEL · 2010 to 2025
$19.0M
Development of antibacterial agents and materialsZIABC011314 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHNEIDER, JOEL · 2010 to 2025
$8.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011313Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of microbial infections, especially those associated with impaired wound healing and biomedical implant failure has spurred the development of new materials having antimicrobial activity. Hydrogels are a class of highly hydrated material finding use in diverse medical applications such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, as wound fillers, and as implant coatings, to name a few. The biocompatible nature of many gels make them a convenient starting platform to develop selectively active antimicrobial materials. Hydrogels with antimicrobial properties can be obtained through the encapsulation or covalent immobilization of known antimicrobial agents, or the material itself can be designed to possess inherent antimicrobial activity. In this review we present an overview of antimicrobial hydrogels that have recently been developed and when possible provide a discussion relevant to their mechanism of action.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsHydrogelsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansTissue EngineeringAnti-Infective AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsantimicrobialbiomaterialshydrogels

Identifiers

PMID24122459
PMCPMC3929057
OpenAlexW1710803940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.