ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2014
Social impact of dialysis on children and their families.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-reported measures in children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease and their validation: A scoping review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Caregiver Perspectives for Pediatric Patients with Acute Kidney Injury on Dialysis: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Article
- Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and caregiver burden in pediatric chronic kidney disease - a mixed methods study from a low resource setting.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Life outcomes after paediatric kidney transplantation: a qualitative, biographical study in long-term survivors.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Providing Kidney Failure Care for Children: A Global Stance.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Caregiver burden in pediatric dialysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the social consequences of dialysis on children and their parents.
methodsFrom January through June 2012 short structured interviews with parents or caregivers of children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) who were followed up at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Faisal Specialty Hospital and Research Center, or the Kidney Center at King Fahad Hospital were conducted. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.
resultsThirty six children (20 boys and 16 girls [corrected] ) and their families were included. The mean (SD) age of the children was 11.5±6.87 y, and the mean (SD) duration of dialysis was 28±11.32 mo. Only one third of the families had the opportunity to choose the modality of dialysis. Both modalities of dialysis had a negative effect on fathers' jobs in over 50% of the cases. Similarly, both modalities of treatment had a considerable impact on the quality of care provided by the mothers to other family members. There was no difference between the two modalities on the frequency of admissions.
conclusionsBoth PD and HD had a negative impact on fathers' jobs and on the level of care provided by mothers to the rest of the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24122420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.