Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013
Phase II trial of second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and capecitabine in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rh-Endostatin Plus Irinotecan/Cisplatin as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase II Study.The oncologist · 2022Trial
- Second-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal cancer: subgroup analysis from KEYNOTE-181.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2022Trial
- The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2016Trial
- Efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
- Personalized and targeted therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an update.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016Review
- Docetaxel and its potential in the treatment of refractory esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a phase II trial of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine to evaluate the antitumor response, toxicity, and survival in pre-treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had failed first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of oral capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14) plus 1-h intravenous docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) on day 1) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Between June 2008 and August 2011, thirty eligible patients with a median age of 58 years (range 38-68 years) were enrolled. Patients received a median of three cycles of treatment (range 1-6). The median follow-up was 15.4 months (range 1.0-31.5 months). Intent-to-treat efficacy analysis demonstrated an overall response rate of 23.3% (0 complete response and 7 partial response) and stable disease of 43.4 % (n = 13). The median time to progression was 3.0 months (95% CI 1.9-4.1 months). The median survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.8-9.8 months). Severe adverse events (grade 3/4) reported were as follows: neutropenia (33.3%, n = 10, including febrile neutropenia 6.7%, n = 2), anemia (16.7%, n = 5), thrombocytopenia (10 %, n = 3), hand-foot syndrome (13.3%, n = 4), and fatigue (10%, n = 3). Docetaxel plus capecitabine had a manageable adverse event profile and promising activity in advance esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as a second-line treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.