ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2014
Personalized medicine in neurodegenerative diseases: how far away?
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with sleep disorders in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment and the nomogram model development.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neural Networks of Knowledge: Ontologies Pioneering Precision Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Review
- Overcoming challenges in the design of drug delivery systems targeting the central nervous system.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Aminochalcones Attenuate Neuronal Cell Death under Oxidative Damage via Sirtuin 1 Activity.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Neuroimaging Methods to Map In Vivo Changes of OXPHOS and Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Role of Mitochondria in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From an Epigenetic Perspective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Ion mobility spectrometry combined with multivariate statistical analysis: revealing the effects of a drug candidate for Alzheimer's disease on Aβ1-40 peptide early assembly.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Incidence of cognitively defined late-onset Alzheimer's dementia subgroups from a prospective cohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2017Article
- Gene Expression Differences in Peripheral Blood of Parkinson's Disease Patients with Distinct Progression Profiles.PloS one · 2016Article
- Can the disease course in Parkinson's disease be slowed?BMC medicine · 2015Article
- Treatment against human endogenous retrovirus: a possible personalized medicine approach for multiple sclerosis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2015Article
- Increase in NF-κB-sensitive miRNA-146a and miRNA-155 in multiple sclerosis (MS) and pro-inflammatory neurodegeneration.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive dysfunction of the nervous system as a result of neuronal loss in the brain and spinal cord. Despite extensive research efforts aimed at development of new disease-modifying therapeutics, there is still no effective treatment to halt neurodegenerative processes. Thus, modification of current therapeutic and diagnostic research strategies is a goal of increasing urgency. The biggest limitation in neurodegenerative disease research is the lack of appropriate biomarkers. Discovery of universal biomarkers capable of diagnosing patients with neurodegenerative diseases, monitoring their response to therapy, and predicting disease progression seems to be a tall order. Instead, a combination of different methodologies in the discovery of biomarkers specific for each described aspect of the disease seems to be a more viable approach. Although application of personalized medicine in diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases may seem far off, some recent developments, such as utilizing specific biological therapies in multiple sclerosis, microRNA profiling as a source of novel biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease, or combination of neuroimaging and proteomic analyses in diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease patients, already point to the way clinical neurology may integrate new achievements in everyday practice. Combination of genomic, proteomic, glycomic, and metabolomic approaches may yield novel insights into molecular mechanisms of disease pathophysiology, which could then be integrated and translated into clinical neurology. Based on the developments during the past decade, it is feasible to predict that a personalized approach to treating neurological disorders will become more widely applicable in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.