Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24121979›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology2013

Can DNA fragmentation of neat or swim-up spermatozoa be used to predict pregnancy following ICSI of fertile oocyte donors?

Jaime Gosálvez, Pedro Caballero, Carmen López-Fernández, Leonor Ortega, José Andrés Guijarro, José Luís Fernández, Stephen D Johnston, Rocío Nuñez-Calonge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation in reproduction: a SWOT analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Standard Semen ParametersThe world journal of men's health · 2021
    Article
  14. Sperm DNA Fragmentation: A New Guideline for Clinicians.The world journal of men's health · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Does sperm DNA fragmentation correlate with semen parameters?Reproductive medicine and biology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review.International urology and nephrology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaime GosálvezFaculty of Biology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Pedro Caballero
Carmen López-Fernández
Leonor Ortega
José Andrés Guijarro
José Luís Fernández
Stephen D Johnston
Rocío Nuñez-Calonge
Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona (Spain) · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESAgriculture and Food · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the potential of assessing sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) from neat semen and the subsequent swim-up (SU) procedure to predict pregnancy when conducting ICSI of fertile donor oocytes. Infertile females (n=81) were transferred embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of their partner's spermatozoa and proven donor oocytes. This model normalized the impact of female factor in putative sperm DNA repair. Semen was blindly assessed for SDF using Halosperm immediately following ejaculation (NS) and after swim-up at the time of ICSI fertilisation. There was a decrease in SDF values of the ejaculated semen sample following the swim-up protocol (P=0.000). Interestingly, pregnancy could be equally predicted from SDF values derived from either neat or swim-up semen samples. Receiver operator curves and the derived Youden's indices determined SDF cutoff values for NS and SU of 24.8% and 17.5%, respectively. Prediction of pregnancy from NS SDF had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 69%, whereas for SU SDF was 78% and 73%, respectively. While increased levels of SDF negatively impact reproductive outcome, we have shown that a reduction in SDF following sperm selection using ICSI with proven donor oocytes is not mandatory for achieving pregnancy. This suggests that a certain level of DNA damage that is not detectable using current technologies could be impacting on the relative success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. Consequently, we propose a modification of the so called 'iceberg model' as a possible rationale for understanding the role of SDF in reproductive outcome.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultFemaleHumansMaleOocytesPregnancySpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID24121979
PMCPMC3854048
OpenAlexW2164224283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.