Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24121824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Direct confocal acquisition of fluorescence from X-gal staining on thick tissue sections.

Konstantin L Levitsky, Juan José Toledo-Aral, José López-Barneo, Javier Villadiego

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Localization of Ceramide Synthase 5 in Mouse Retina.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Chimeric ORF Fusion Phenotypic Reporter forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cells · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantin L LevitskyInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Juan José Toledo-Aral
José López-Barneo
Javier Villadiego

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-gal staining is a common procedure used in the histochemical monitoring of gene expression by light microscopy. However, this procedure does not permit the direct confocal acquisition of images, thus preventing the identification of labelled cells on the depth (Z) axis of tissue sections and leading sometimes to erroneous conclusions in co-localization and gene expression studies. Here we report a technique, based on X-gal fluorescence emission and mathematically-based optical correction, to obtain high quality fluorescence confocal images. This method, combined with immunofluorescence, makes it possible to unequivocally identify X-gal-labelled cells in tissue sections, emerging as a valuable tool in gene expression and cell tracing analysis.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseFluorometryGalactosidesGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterHistocytological Preparation TechniquesIndolesMice5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-galactosidebeta-GalactosidaseGalactosidesIndoles

Identifiers

PMID24121824
PMCPMC3796308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.