Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24121272›Full record

ReviewOncogene2014

SRChing for the substrates of Src.

A B Reynolds, S B Kanner, A H Bouton, M D Schaller, S A Weed, D C Flynn, J T Parsons

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A B ReynoldsDepartment of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
S B KannerArrowhead Research Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
A H BoutonDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
M D SchallerDepartment of Biochemistry, 3124 HSN, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
S A WeedDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, 1833 Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
D C FlynnDepartment of Medical Lab Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
J T ParsonsDepartments of Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
West Virginia University · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Virginia Cancer CenterVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Role of p120-catenin in cell transformationR01GM102524 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI REYNOLDS, ALBERT B · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By the mid 1980's, it was clear that the transforming activity of oncogenic Src was linked to the activity of its tyrosine kinase domain and attention turned to identifying substrates, the putative next level of control in the pathway to transformation. Among the first to recognize the potential of phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies, Parsons and colleagues launched a risky shotgun-based approach that led ultimately to the cDNA cloning and functional characterization of many of today's best-known Src substrates (for example, p85-Cortactin, p110-AFAP1, p130Cas, p125FAK and p120-catenin). Two decades and over 6000 citations later, the original goals of the project may be seen as secondary to the enormous impact of these protein substrates in many areas of biology. At the request of the editors, this review is not restricted to the current status of the substrates, but reflects also on the anatomy of the project itself and some of the challenges and decisions encountered along the way.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsCateninsCell Transformation, NeoplasticCortactinCrk-Associated Substrate ProteinDelta CateninFocal Adhesion Kinase 1HumansMiceMicrofilament ProteinsNeoplasmsPhosphorylationProteomesrc-Family KinasesAFAP1 protein, humanBCAR1 protein, humanCateninsCortactinCrk-Associated Substrate ProteinCTTN protein, humanDelta CateninFocal Adhesion Kinase 1Microfilament ProteinsProteomePTK2 protein, humansrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24121272
OpenAlexW1997690305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.