Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24121074›Full record

ArticleColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces2014

In vitro evaluation of TLR4 agonist activity: formulation effects.

Ayesha Misquith, H W Millie Fung, Quinton M Dowling, Jeffrey A Guderian, Thomas S Vedvick, Christopher B Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Vaccine adjuvants for infectious disease in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Therapeutic efficacy againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Optimizing a Multi-Component IntranasalFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Vaccine adjuvant activity of emulsified oils from species of the Pinaceae family.Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayesha MisquithInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
H W Millie FungInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Quinton M DowlingInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Jeffrey A GuderianInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Thomas S VedvickInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Christopher B FoxInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), 1124 Columbia Street, Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. Electronic address: cfox@idri.org.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800045CPHS HHS HHSO100201000039C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective in vitro evaluation of vaccine adjuvants would allow higher throughput screening compared to in vivo studies. However, vaccine adjuvants comprise a wide range of structures and formulations ranging from soluble TLR agonists to complex lipid-based formulations. The effects of formulation parameters on in vitro bioactivity assays and the correlations with in vivo adjuvant activity is not well understood. In the present work, we employ the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay and a human macrophage cellular cytokine production assay to demonstrate the differences in in vitro bioactivity of four distinct formulations of the synthetic TLR4 agonist GLA: an aqueous nanosuspension (GLA-AF), an oil-in-water emulsion (GLA-SE), a liposome (GLA-LS), and an alum-adsorbed formulation (GLA-Alum). Furthermore, we demonstrate the importance of the localization of GLA on in vitro potency. By comparing to previous published reports on the in vivo bioactivity of these GLA-containing formulations, we conclude that the most potent activators of the in vitro systems may not be the most potent in vivo adjuvant formulations. Furthermore, we discuss the formulation considerations which should be taken into account when interpreting data from in vitro adjuvant activity assays.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicParticle SizeToll-Like Receptor 4Adjuvants, ImmunologicToll-Like Receptor 4Glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvantIn vitro bioactivityParticle sizePhysicochemical characterizationTLR4 agonistVaccine adjuvant formulation

Identifiers

PMID24121074
PMCPMC3877169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.