Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24120586›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2013

Neonatal outcomes of pregnancies affected by haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn and managed with intrauterine transfusion: a service evaluation.

Katherine A Birchenall, Sebastian E Illanes, Francisco Lopez, Timothy Overton, Rachel Liebling, Peter W Soothill, Sherif Abdel-Fattah, Mark Denbow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Recommendations for transfusion therapy in neonatology.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine A BirchenallFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sebastian E IllanesFoetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Andes, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Santiago, Chile.
Francisco LopezFoetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Andes, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Santiago, Chile.
Timothy OvertonFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rachel LieblingFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter W SoothillFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sherif Abdel-FattahFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mark DenbowFoetal Medicine Unit, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study, conducted in the tertiary Foetal Medicine Unit at St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, was designed to obtain information regarding neonatal outcomes of pregnancies affected by haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn and managed by intrauterine transfusion, and to determine whether a change in intrauterine transfusion protocol in 2004 had improved safety. The new protocol included attendance of two Foetal Medicine Unit consultants, foetal sedation and use of the intrahepatic vein as an alternative route to placental cord insertion if deemed safer. MATERIALS AND

methodsData for pregnancies affected by haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn as a result of haemolytic red cell alloimmunisation and managed with intrauterine transfusion at St Michael's Hospital between 1999 and 2009 were retrospectively collected using local databases, and medical note review.

resultsOverall, 256 relevant intrauterine transfusions were performed. The median number of intrauterine transfusions per pregnancy was two. Ninety-three per cent of the live deliveries had 5-minute APGAR scores ≥9 and 98% were admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Special Care Baby Unit, requiring phototherapy (96%), top-up transfusions (44%: 23.2% immediate, 13.4% late, 7.3% both), and exchange transfusion (37%). An association was found between increased intrauterine transfusion number and reduced phototherapy duration and hospital admission: each additional intrauterine transfusion reduced the duration of phototherapy by 16% (95% CI: 0.72-0.98), and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Special Care Baby Unit admission by 44% (95% CI: 0.48-0.66). Following the change in intrauterine transfusion protocol, there was a significant reduction in the number of emergency Caesarean sections occurring directly after an intrauterine transfusion (n =5 vs 0; P =0.02). The foetal loss rate within 48 hours of an intrauterine transfusion was 1.9% per pregnancy, or 0.8% per intrauterine transfusion: no losses occurred under the new protocol (n =3 vs 0; P = NS). DISCUSSION: Although the majority of neonates required admission to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Special Care Baby Unit and phototherapy, the medium-term outcomes were positive. Importantly, the safety of the intrauterine transfusion procedure has improved significantly since the change in protocol.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAdultBlood Transfusion, IntrauterineErythroblastosis, FetalFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24120586
PMCPMC3827399
OpenAlexW1504030383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.