Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24119561›Full record

ArticleHuman pathology2013

Utility of α-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (p504s) immunohistochemistry in distinguishing endometrial clear cell carcinomas from serous and endometrioid carcinomas.

Oluwole Fadare, Vinita Parkash, Katja Gwin, Krisztina Z Hanley, Elke A Jarboe, Sharon X Liang, Charles M Quick, Wenxin Zheng, Kojo R Rawish, Jonathan L Hecht and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in the pathogenesis of endometrial clear cell carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Recommendations.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2019
    Review
  7. How to approach the many faces of endometrioid carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016
    Review
  8. Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oluwole FadareDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: oluwolefadare@yahoo.com.
Vinita Parkash
Katja Gwin
Krisztina Z Hanley
Elke A Jarboe
Sharon X Liang
Charles M Quick
Wenxin Zheng
Kojo R Rawish
Jonathan L Hecht
Mohamed M Desouki

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of α-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) has previously been reported in 75% to 100% of urethral/bladder clear cell carcinomas, tumors that are known to display broad phenotypic overlap with their identically named müllerian counterparts. Herein, we assess the utility of AMACR in distinguishing endometrial clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) from endometrial serous carcinomas (ESCs) and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs). A total of 111 endometrial carcinomas in a tissue microarray, including 49 CCCs, 13 ESCs, and 49 EECs, were assessed for AMACR immunoreactivity, with results scored semiquantitatively (scores 0, 1+, 2+, 3+ for 0%, 1%-5%, 6%-50%, >50% immunoreactive cells, respectively). Fifty (45%) of the 111 carcinomas were AMACR positive, with the following score distribution: CCC: 0 (n = 12), 1+ (n = 12), 2+ (n = 3), 3+ (n = 22); EEC: 0 (n = 38), 1+ (n = 4), 2+ (n = 4), 3+ (n = 3); ESC: 0 (n = 11), 1+ (n = 1), 2+ (n = 0), 3+ (n = 1). AMACR expression was significantly more frequent in CCC (75%) than in ESC (15%) or EEC (22%); P < .0001. The sensitivity and specificity of AMACR expression in classifying a carcinoma as CCC were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.88), respectively, with an odds ratio of 11.62 (95% CI, 5-28; P < .001) and an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.88). These findings indicate that AMACR expression is strongly associated with CCC and displays a relatively robust diagnostic test performance. However, its practical utility may be limited by the focal nature of its expression in 32% of the AMACR-positive CCC cases as well as its expression in 15% to 22% of the non-CCC histotypes.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, EndometrioidCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDiagnosis, DifferentialEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedRacemases and Epimerasesalpha-methylacyl-CoA racemaseBiomarkers, TumorRacemases and EpimerasesAlpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemaseAMACREndometrial clear cell carcinomaImmunohistochemistryp504s

Identifiers

PMID24119561
PMCPMC3865867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.