Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24119538›Full record

ReviewEmerging health threats journal2013

Human enterovirus 71 epidemics: what's next?

Cyril C Y Yip, Susanna K P Lau, Patrick C Y Woo, Kwok-Yung Yuen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging health threats journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Antiviral Activity of Marine BacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Blood virosphere in febrile Tanzanian children.Emerging microbes & infections · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cyril C Y YipDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Susanna K P Lau
Patrick C Y Woo
Kwok-Yung Yuen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human enterovirus 71 (EV71) epidemics have affected various countries in the past 40 years. EV71 commonly causes hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in children, but can result in neurological and cardiorespiratory complications in severe cases. Genotypic changes of EV71 have been observed in different places over time, with the emergence of novel genotypes or subgenotypes giving rise to serious outbreaks. Since the late 1990s, intra- and inter-typic recombination events in EV71 have been increasingly reported in the Asia-Pacific region. In particular, 'double-recombinant' EV71 strains belonging to a novel genotype D have been predominant in mainland China and Hong Kong over the last decade, though co-circulating with a minority of other EV71 subgenotypes and coxsackie A viruses. Continuous surveillance and genome studies are important to detect potential novel mutants or recombinants in the near future. Rapid and sensitive molecular detection of EV71 is of paramount importance in anticipating and combating EV71 outbreaks.

Indexed as

ChildChinaCoxsackievirus InfectionsDisease OutbreaksEnterovirus A, HumanEvolution, MolecularGenotypeHand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseHumansMutationRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAevolutiongenotypehand, foot and mouth diseasehuman enterovirus 71mutationrecombination

Identifiers

PMID24119538
PMCPMC3772321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.