Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24119384›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2014

Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case-control study.

Anthony L Traboulsee, Katherine B Knox, Lindsay Machan, Yinshan Zhao, Irene Yee, Alexander Rauscher, Darren Klass, Peter Szkup, Robert Otani, David Kopriva and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developmental venous anomalies in patients with multiple sclerosis: is that a coincidence or an ancillary finding?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony L TraboulseeDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: t.traboulsee@ubc.ca.
Katherine B KnoxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Lindsay MachanDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Yinshan ZhaoDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Irene YeeDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexander RauscherDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Darren KlassDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Peter SzkupDepartment of Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Robert OtaniDepartment of Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
David KoprivaDepartment of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Shanti LalaDepartment of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
David K LiDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dessa SadovnickDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency has been proposed as a unique combination of extracranial venous blockages and haemodynamic flow abnormalities that occurs only in patients with multiple sclerosis and not in healthy people. Initial reports indicated that all patients with multiple sclerosis had chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. We aimed to establish the prevalence of venous narrowing in people with multiple sclerosis, unaffected full siblings, and unrelated healthy volunteers.

methodsWe did an assessor-blinded, case-control, multicentre study of people with multiple sclerosis, unaffected siblings, and unrelated healthy volunteers. We enrolled the study participants between January, 2011 and March, 2012, and they comprised 177 adults: 79 with multiple sclerosis, 55 siblings, and 43 unrelated controls, from three centres in Canada. We assessed narrowing of the internal jugular and azygous veins with catheter venography and ultrasound criteria for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency proposed by Zamboni and colleagues. Catheter venography data were available for 149 participants and ultrasound data for 171 participants.

findingsCatheter venography criteria for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency were positive for one of 65 (2%) people with multiple sclerosis, one of 46 (2%) siblings, and one of 32 (3%) unrelated controls (p=1·0 for all comparisons). Greater than 50% narrowing of any major vein was present in 48 of 65 (74%) people with multiple sclerosis, 31 of 47 (66%) siblings (p=0·41 for comparison with patients with multiple sclerosis), and 26 of 37 (70%) unrelated controls (p=0·82). The ultrasound criteria for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency were fulfilled in 35 of 79 (44%) participants with multiple sclerosis, 17 of 54 (31%) siblings (p=0·15 for comparison with patients with multiple sclerosis) and 17 of 38 (45%) unrelated controls (p=0·98). The sensitivity of the ultrasound criteria for detection of greater than 50% narrowing on catheter venography was 0·406 (95% CI 0·311-0·508), and specificity was 0·643 (0·480-0·780).

interpretationThis study shows that chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency occurs rarely in both patients with multiple sclerosis and in healthy people. Extracranial venous narrowing of greater than 50% is a frequent finding in patients with multiple sclerosis, unaffected siblings, and unrelated controls. The ultrasound criteria are neither sensitive nor specific for narrowing on catheter venography. The significance of venous narrowing to multiple sclerosis symptomatology remains unknown.

fundingMS Society of Canada, Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation, Lotte and John Hecht Memorial Foundation, Vancouver Coastal Health Foundation, and the Wolridge Foundation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAzygos VeinCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseHumansJugular VeinsMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPhlebographySensitivity and SpecificitySiblingsUltrasonographyVascular Access DevicesVenous Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID24119384
OpenAlexW2165332393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.