Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24119093›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2014

Yeast replicative aging: a paradigm for defining conserved longevity interventions.

Brian M Wasko, Matt Kaeberlein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Is a Cellular Ageing Regulator.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian M WaskoDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matt Kaeberlein
University of Washington · US

Funding

Environmetal Pathology/Toxicology Training ProgramT32ES007032 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAUSTMAN, ELAINE M, ROSENFELD, MICHAEL E · 1985 to 2023
$10.7M
Defining the Mechanisms of genotype-dependent responses to caloric restrictionR01AG039390 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAEBERLEIN, MATT · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039390NIA NIH HHS R01AG039390NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007032NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES007032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The finite replicative life span of budding yeast mother cells was demonstrated as early as 1959, but the idea that budding yeast could be used to model aging of multicellular eukaryotes did not enter the scientific mainstream until relatively recently. Despite continued skepticism by some, there are now abundant data that several interventions capable of extending yeast replicative life span have a similar effect in multicellular eukaryotes including nematode worms, fruit flies, and rodents. In particular, dietary restriction, mTOR signaling, and sirtuins are among the most studied longevity interventions in the field. Here, we describe key conserved longevity pathways in yeast and discuss relationships that may help explain how such broad conservation of aging processes could have evolved.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophilaModels, BiologicalRodentiaSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCaenorhabditis eleganscaloric restrictioncalorie restrictionreplicative life spantarget of rapamycinyeast

Identifiers

PMID24119093
PMCPMC4134429
OpenAlexW2045441603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.