Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118904›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

Modeling the next generation sequencing sample processing pipeline for the purposes of classification.

Noushin Ghaffari, Mohammadmahdi R Yousefi, Charles D Johnson, Ivan Ivanov, Edward R Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Q-Nuc: a bioinformatics pipeline for the quantitative analysis of nucleosomal profiles.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Detecting Multivariate Gene Interactions in RNA-Seq Data Using Optimal Bayesian Classification.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noushin GhaffariAgriLife Genomics and Bioinformatics Services, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M System, College Station, Texas, TX, 77843, USA. nghaffari@tamu.edu.
Mohammadmahdi R Yousefi
Charles D Johnson
Ivan Ivanov
Edward R Dougherty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key goal of systems biology and translational genomics is to utilize high-throughput measurements of cellular states to develop expression-based classifiers for discriminating among different phenotypes. Recent developments of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies can facilitate classifier design by providing expression measurements for tens of thousands of genes simultaneously via the abundance of their mRNA transcripts. Because NGS technologies result in a nonlinear transformation of the actual expression distributions, their application can result in data that are less discriminative than would be the actual expression levels themselves, were they directly observable.

resultsUsing state-of-the-art distributional modeling for the NGS processing pipeline, this paper studies how that pipeline, via the resulting nonlinear transformation, affects classification and feature selection. The effects of different factors are considered and NGS-based classification is compared to SAGE-based classification and classification directly on the raw expression data, which is represented by a very high-dimensional model previously developed for gene expression. As expected, the nonlinear transformation resulting from NGS processing diminishes classification accuracy; however, owing to a larger number of reads, NGS-based classification outperforms SAGE-based classification.

conclusionsHaving high numbers of reads can mitigate the degradation in classification performance resulting from the effects of NGS technologies. Hence, when performing a RNA-Seq analysis, using the highest possible coverage of the genome is recommended for the purposes of classification.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, GeneticRNA, MessengerSystems BiologyRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24118904
PMCPMC3819514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.