Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118891›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2016

Patients' views of teamwork in the emergency department offer insights about team performance.

Beverly W Henry, Danielle M McCarthy, Anna P Nannicelli, Nicholas P Seivert, John A Vozenilek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beverly W HenryNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Danielle M McCarthyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anna P NannicelliCenter for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nicholas P SeivertCenter for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
John A VozenilekJump Trading Simulation and Education Center, Order of Saint Francis Healthcare, Peoria, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch into efforts to engage patients in the assessment of health-care teams is limited.

objectiveTo explore, through qualitative methods, patient awareness of teamwork-related behaviours observed during an emergency department (ED) visit.

designResearchers used semi-structured question guides for audio-recorded interviews and analysed their verbatim transcripts. SETTING AND

participantsResearchers conducted individual phone interviews with 6 teamwork subject matter experts (SMEs) and held 5 face-to-face group interviews with patients and caregivers (n = 25) about 2 weeks after discharge from the emergency department (ED).

resultsSMEs suggested that a range of factors influence patient perspectives of teams. Many patients perceived the health-care team within the context of their expectations of an ED visit and their treatment plan. Four themes emerged: (i) patient-centred views highlight gaps in coordination and communication; (ii) team processes do concern patients; (iii) patients are critical observers of ways that team members present their team roles; (iv) patients' observations of team members relate to patients' views of team effectiveness. Analysis also indicated that patients viewed health-care team members' interactions with each other as proxy for how team members actually felt about patients. DISCUSSION: Results from both sets of interviews (SME and patient) indicated that patient observations of teamwork could add to assessment of team processes/frameworks. Patients' understanding about teamwork organization seemed helpful and witnessed interteam communication appeared to influence patient confidence in the team.

conclusionPatients perspectives are an important part of assessment in health care and suggest potential areas for improvement through team training.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPatient Care TeamProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationCooperative BehaviorEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatientscommunicationemergency departmentpatient perceptionsteam trainingteamwork

Identifiers

PMID24118891
PMCPMC5055233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.