Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118775›Full record

SynthesisCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2013

Effects of intravenous and intrathecal dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis.

Xiao-Yin Niu, Xi-Bing Ding, Ting Guo, Ming-Hui Chen, Shu-Kun Fu, Quan Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Bispectral Index-Guided Sedation During Spinal Anesthesia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Mechanism, Dose, and Administration of Dexmedetomidine in Managing Visceral Pain Associated With Surgery: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Yin NiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xi-Bing Ding
Ting Guo
Ming-Hui Chen
Shu-Kun Fu
Quan Li
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effects of dexmedetomidine on the duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, hypotension, bradycardia, and side effects in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

methodsTwo researchers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane controlled trial register independently for randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine with a placebo without any language restrictions.

resultsA total of 412 patients from eight trials were included in this study. The results revealed that dexmedetomidine was statistically significant in prolonging the duration of sensory block (mean difference, MD = 73.55; 95% CI, [55.69, 91.40] P < 0.00001, I(2)  = 89%) and motor block (MD = 59.11; 95% CI, [29.58, 88.65] P < 0.00001, I(2)  = 91%) and the time to first request for postoperative analgesia (MD = 245.77, 95% CI, [143.53, 348.00] P < 0.00001, I(2)  = 98%). The occurrence of hypotension (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, [0.3-1.23], P = 0.40, I(2)  = 3%) and side effects (OR = 0.9, 95% CI, [0.36-2.22], P = 0.88, I(2)  = 0%) was not significantly different between dexmedetomidine and placebo. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with more frequent bradycardia requiring atropine (OR = 7.55; 95% CI, [2.76-20.63], P = 0.63, I(2)  = 0%).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis has shown that dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of spinal anesthesia and improved postoperative analgesia and did not increase the incidence of hypotension and adverse events, but needs more atropine to reverse bradycardia.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalDexmedetomidineHumansHypnotics and SedativesInjections, IntravenousInjections, SpinalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesBradycardiaDexmedetomidineDuration of sensory and motor blockHypotensionPostoperative analgesiaSide effects

Identifiers

PMID24118775
PMCPMC6493572
OpenAlexW2108980610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.