Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118677›Full record

Trial reportVeterinary and comparative oncology2016

Carboplatin versus alternating carboplatin and doxorubicin for the adjuvant treatment of canine appendicular osteosarcoma: a randomized, phase III trial.

K A Skorupski, J M Uhl, A Szivek, S D Allstadt Frazier, R B Rebhun, C O Rodriguez

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Canine and murine models of osteosarcoma.Veterinary pathology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel application of single-cell next-generation sequencing for determination of intratumoral heterogeneity of canine osteosarcoma cell lines.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent and current clinical trials in canine appendicular osteosarcoma.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K A SkorupskiDepartment of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
J M UhlVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
A SzivekVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
S D Allstadt FrazierDepartment of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
R B RebhunDepartment of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
C O RodriguezDepartment of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital · US

Funding

The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor and hedgehog signalingK01OD011111 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI REBHUN, ROBERT B · 2012 to 2015
$517k
NIH HHS K01 OD011111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous published studies describing adjuvant chemotherapy for canine appendicular osteosarcoma, there is no consensus as to the optimal chemotherapy protocol. The purpose of this study was to determine whether either of two protocols would be associated with longer disease-free interval (DFI) in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma following amputation. Dogs with histologically confirmed appendicular osteosarcoma that were free of gross metastases and underwent amputation were eligible for enrollment. Dogs were randomized to receive either six doses of carboplatin or three doses each of carboplatin and doxorubicin on an alternating schedule. Fifty dogs were included. Dogs receiving carboplatin alone had a significantly longer DFI (425 versus 135 days) than dogs receiving alternating carboplatin and doxorubicin (P = 0.04). Toxicity was similar between groups. These results suggest that six doses of carboplatin may be associated superior DFI when compared to six total doses of carboplatin and doxorubicin.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantDog DiseasesDogsDoxorubicinOsteosarcomaAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinDoxorubicinamputationbone tumourcaninechemotherapyclinical trial

Identifiers

PMID24118677
PMCPMC5012431
OpenAlexW1942473047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.