Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118668›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2013

Unlocking the vault: next-generation museum population genomics.

Ke Bi, Tyler Linderoth, Dan Vanderpool, Jeffrey M Good, Rasmus Nielsen, Craig Moritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ke BiMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Tyler Linderoth
Dan Vanderpool
Jeffrey M Good
Rasmus Nielsen
Craig Moritz

Funding

GENOMICST32HG000047 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RASMUS NIELSEN, Daniel Soleyman Rokhsar · 2000 to 2026
$13.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC INSTRUMENTATIONK22HG000047 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI BRODY, JAMES P · 2000 to 2004
$964k
NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG000047NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000047NHGRI NIH HHS T32HG000047-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural history museum collections provide unique resources for understanding how species respond to environmental change, including the abrupt, anthropogenic climate change of the past century. Ideally, researchers would conduct genome-scale screening of museum specimens to explore the evolutionary consequences of environmental changes, but to date such analyses have been severely limited by the numerous challenges of working with the highly degraded DNA typical of historic samples. Here, we circumvent these challenges by using custom, multiplexed, exon capture to enrich and sequence ~11,000 exons (~4 Mb) from early 20th-century museum skins. We used this approach to test for changes in genomic diversity accompanying a climate-related range retraction in the alpine chipmunks (Tamias alpinus) in the high Sierra Nevada area of California, USA. We developed robust bioinformatic pipelines that rigorously detect and filter out base misincorporations in DNA derived from skins, most of which likely resulted from postmortem damage. Furthermore, to accommodate genotyping uncertainties associated with low-medium coverage data, we applied a recently developed probabilistic method to call single-nucleotide polymorphisms and estimate allele frequencies and the joint site frequency spectrum. Our results show increased genetic subdivision following range retraction, but no change in overall genetic diversity at either nonsynonymous or synonymous sites. This case study showcases the advantages of integrating emerging genomic and statistical tools in museum collection-based population genomic applications. Such technical advances greatly enhance the value of museum collections, even where a pre-existing reference is lacking and points to a broad range of potential applications in evolutionary and conservation biology.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeMuseumsAnimalsCaliforniaDNA DamageExonsGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSciuridaeSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptomeDNA damageexon capturemuseum skinsnatural history museum collectionsnonmodel organismsTamias

Identifiers

PMID24118668
PMCPMC4134471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.