Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118624›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2013

Avoidance-based human Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.

Andrea H Lewis, Michael A Niznikiewicz, Andrew R Delamater, Mauricio R Delgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cortical Beta Power Reflects the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Motivational control of habits: A preregistered fMRI study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Measuring maladaptive avoidance: from animal models to clinical anxiety.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  14. Aversive motivation and cognitive control.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Motivational factors underlying aversive Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea H LewisDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Michael A Niznikiewicz
Andrew R Delamater
Mauricio R Delgado

Funding

Neural mechanisms of avoidance learning and active coping via emotion regulationR01DA027764 · NIDA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI DELGADO, MAURICIO R. · 2009 to 2016
$2.2M
A Multi-Component Approach to Extinction in Pavlovian LearningSC1DA034995 · NIDA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI DELAMATER, ANDREW · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA027764NIDA NIH HHS DA034995NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027764NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA034995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm probes the influence of Pavlovian cues over instrumentally learned behavior. The paradigm has been used extensively to probe basic cognitive and motivational processes in studies of animal learning. More recently, PIT and its underlying neural basis have been extended to investigations in humans. These initial neuroimaging studies of PIT have focused on the influence of appetitively conditioned stimuli on instrumental responses maintained by positive reinforcement, and highlight the involvement of the striatum. In the current study, we sought to understand the neural correlates of PIT in an aversive Pavlovian learning situation when instrumental responding was maintained through negative reinforcement. Participants exhibited specific PIT, wherein selective increases in instrumental responding to conditioned stimuli occurred when the stimulus signaled a specific aversive outcome whose omission negatively reinforced the instrumental response. Additionally, a general PIT effect was observed such that when a stimulus was associated with a different aversive outcome than was used to negatively reinforce instrumental behavior, the presence of that stimulus caused a non-selective increase in overall instrumental responding. Both specific and general PIT behavioral effects correlated with increased activation in corticostriatal circuitry, particularly in the striatum, a region involved in cognitive and motivational processes. These results suggest that avoidance-based PIT utilizes a similar neural mechanism to that seen with PIT in an appetitive context, which has implications for understanding mechanisms of drug-seeking behavior during addiction and relapse.

Indexed as

Brain MappingConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumFemaleHumansMaleMotivationYoung Adultgoal-directedinstrumentalmotivationnegative reinforcementstriatum

Identifiers

PMID24118624
PMCPMC3865081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.