Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118588›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2013

Cuticular hydrocarbon divergence in the jewel wasp Nasonia: evolutionary shifts in chemical communication channels?

J Buellesbach, J Gadau, L W Beukeboom, F Echinger, R Raychoudhury, J H Werren, T Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SilencingProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Males of the parasitoid wasp,Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  13. Cuticular Hydrocarbon Plasticity in Three Rice Planthopper Species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J BuellesbachDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
J Gadau
L W Beukeboom
F Echinger
R Raychoudhury
J H Werren
T Schmitt

Funding

Genetic and genomic tools for the emerging model organsism, NasoniaR24GM084917 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WERREN, JOHN HAYNES · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R24GM084917NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM084917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution and maintenance of intraspecific communication channels constitute a key feature of chemical signalling and sexual communication. However, how divergent chemical communication channels evolve while maintaining their integrity for both sender and receiver is poorly understood. In this study, we compare male and female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles in the jewel wasp genus Nasonia, analyse their chemical divergence and investigate their role as species-specific sexual signalling cues. Males and females of all four Nasonia species showed unique, nonoverlapping CHC profiles unambiguously separating them. Surprisingly, male and female phylogenies based on the chemical distances between their CHC profiles differed dramatically, where only male CHC divergence parallels the molecular phylogeny of Nasonia. In particular, N. giraulti female CHC profiles were the most divergent from all other species and very different from its most closely related sibling species N. oneida. Furthermore, although our behavioural assays indicate that female CHC profiles can generally be perceived as sexual cues attracting males in Nasonia, this function has apparently been lost in the highly divergent female N. giraulti CHC profiles. Curiously, N. giraulti males are still attracted to heterospecific, but not to conspecific female CHC profiles. We suggest that this striking discrepancy has been caused by an extensive evolutionary shift in female N. giraulti CHC profiles, which are no longer used as conspecific recognition cues. Our study constitutes the first report of an apparent abandonment of a sexual recognition cue that the receiver did not adapt to.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAnimalsCluster AnalysisEvolution, MolecularFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGenetic SpeciationHydrocarbonsMalePhylogenySex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalSpecies SpecificityWaspsHydrocarbonsSex Attractantsevolution of chemical communicationgas chromatography-mass spectrometrymate choicesex pheromonessignal receiver co-evolutionspeciationspecies discrimination

Identifiers

PMID24118588
PMCPMC3809909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.