Trial reportEuropean journal of haematology2014
Characterization of different regimens for initiating anagrelide in patients with essential thrombocythemia who are intolerant or refractory to their current cytoreductive therapy: results from the multicenter FOX study of 177 patients in France.
Trial report in European journal of haematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Efficacy and safety of anagrelide in treatment of essential thrombocythemia: multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2015Trial
- Comparison of starting doses of anagrelide as a first-line therapy in patients with cytoreductive therapy-naïve essential thrombocythemia: difference between starting at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/day.International journal of hematology · 2020Article
- The Use of Anagrelide in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, with Focus on Essential Thrombocythemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify switch modalities used when initiating second- or third-line anagrelide for essential thrombocythemia (ET), assess whether anagrelide is initiated consistently with Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) recommendations, and determine whether different observed switch regimens have any relationship with maintenance, platelet response, or tolerability.
methodsThis observational study was conducted across 43 centers in France. High-risk patients (>60 yr of age and/or history of thrombosis and/or platelet count >1000 × 10(9) /L) with ET starting second- or third-line anagrelide therapy were identified and monitored for 6 months.
resultsA total of 177 patients were enrolled. The SPC-recommended starting dose (1 mg/d) was used in 52.6% of patients; 0.5 mg/d was used in 41.1%. 77.1% of patients underwent an anagrelide dose increase during the study. At 6-month follow-up, 84.7% of patients (n = 144/170) were still receiving anagrelide; 70.6% (n = 120/170) achieved a platelet response. A higher proportion of patients who discontinued previous cytoreductive therapy (CRT) after initiating anagrelide achieved a platelet response (n = 34/39, 87.2%) vs. patients who discontinued their previous CRT before anagrelide initiation (n = 77/115, 67.0%). Platelet response rates were higher in patients whose anagrelide initiation was consistent (n = 100/133, 75.2%) vs. inconsistent (n = 20/37, 54.1%) with the SPC. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was lower in patients whose anagrelide treatment was consistent (n = 52/133, 39.1%) vs. inconsistent (n = 25/37, 67.6%) with the SPC.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, the FOX study provides the first comprehensive real-world data on the modalities used when switching from previous CRT to anagrelide. Highest platelet responses were observed when previous CRT was discontinued after anagrelide initiation or when anagrelide was initiated consistently with the SPC. Safety data corresponded with the SPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.