Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118369›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2014

Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Erika A Waters, Caroline Kincaid, Annette R Kaufman, Michelle L Stock, Laurel M Peterson, Nicole L Muscanell, Rosanna E Guadagno

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Relationship Between Young Adult Smokers' Beliefs About Nicotine Addiction and Smoking-Related Affect and Cognitions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  6. A preliminary exploration of college smokers' reactions to nicotine dependence genetic susceptibility feedback.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erika A WatersDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Caroline Kincaid
Annette R Kaufman
Michelle L Stock
Laurel M Peterson
Nicole L Muscanell
Rosanna E Guadagno

Funding

NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD006280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany health risks are associated with both genetic and behavioural factors. Concerns have been raised that learning about such multifactorial risks might have detrimental effects on health-related beliefs, cognitions, and affect. However, experimental evidence is sparse.

objectiveTo explore the effects of reading an online news article about the discovery of a genetic basis for nicotine addiction.

methodsSmokers (N = 333) were recruited from the psychology subject pools of two major universities. Participants were randomly assigned to read one of three news articles: one describing a genetic basis for nicotine addiction and lung cancer obtained from a national news source, one altered to indicate no genetic basis for nicotine addiction and lung cancer, or one unrelated attention control. Participants then completed an online questionnaire, which assessed smoking-related cognitions and affect, and beliefs about nicotine addiction, quitting smoking, and whether the harms of tobacco use are delayed.

resultsThere was no statistically significant influence of experimental condition on smoking-related cognitions/affect (ps > .05, η(2)  < .002), beliefs about addiction and quitting (Wilks' λ = .98, p = .66, η(2)  = .01), or delayed harm (ps > .05, η(2)  < .002).

conclusionReading an online news article about the presence or absence of a genetic basis for nicotine addiction was not found to change smoking-related cognitions/affect or beliefs among young adult smokers. Concerns about negative effects of multifactorial risk information on health beliefs may be premature. Nevertheless, to effectively translate basic genomics research into effective public health practice, further research should investigate these issues in different populations, via different communication modalities, and for different health outcomes. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Information about the health implications of the interaction between genetics and behaviour is becoming prevalent. Learning about these interactions may reduce perceived risk and intentions to engage in health behaviours. What does this study add? Informing young adult smokers about the genetic basis for nicotine addiction does not affect health beliefs negatively. Responses are not moderated by endorsing the idea of genetic causation or current/experimenter smoking status.

Indexed as

Health EducationAdolescentAttitude to HealthFemaleHumansMaleSmokingSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultattitudesbehaviourgene-by-environmentgeneticmultifactorialsmokingtobacco use

Identifiers

PMID24118369
PMCPMC4447329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.