Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118165›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2014

Multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study on the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for women with urgency urinary incontinence.

Tomonori Yamanishi, Yukio Homma, Osamu Nishizawa, Kosaku Yasuda, Osamu Yokoyama, SMN-X Study Group

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05735522 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Sham-controlled Study on the Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Female Urgency Urinary Incontinence.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsUrinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Pelvic Floor DisordersArmsExtracorporeal magnetic stimulation, Sham
NCT06349694 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneos Medial Plantar Nerve and Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsUrinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsTranscutaneous MPN stimulation (T-MPNS), Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), BT (Control group)
NCT06390488 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Medial Plantar Nerve Stimulation in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsUrinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsTranscutaneous medial plantar nerve stimulation (T-MPNS), Sham Transcutaneous medial plantar nerve stimulation (T-MPNS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomonori YamanishiDepartment of Urology, Continence Center, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Yukio Homma
Osamu Nishizawa
Kosaku Yasuda
Osamu Yokoyama
SMN-X Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnetic stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence in women with overactive bladder.

methodsA total of 151 women with urgency incontinence were randomized to the active stimulation group or the sham stimulation group in a 2:1 order. An armchair type magnetic stimulator was used for 25-min magnetic stimulation twice a week, with the maximum magnetic flux density of 560 mT peak at 10 Hz. The sham device was set to deliver in a 5-s "on"-5-s "off" pulsing manner with the maximum intensity of 20.4% of active stimulation at 1 Hz. The study consisted of a baseline period for 1 week, and a treatment period for 6 weeks. The primary end-point was the number of leaks/week from the bladder diary. The secondary end-points were the number of voids and urgency/24 h, mean and maximum voided volume, and the quality of life assessment.

resultsChanges from baseline in the active and sham group, respectively, were -13.08 ± 11.00 and -8.68 ± 13.49 in leaks/week (P = 0.038), -2.65 ± 2.52 and -1.53 ± 2.39 in number of urgency/24 h (P = 0.011), and 14.03 ± 34.53 mL and -4.15 ± 40.60 mL in mean voided volume (P = 0.0056). As for safety, except for diarrhea and constipation, no patients experienced any device-related adverse event.

conclusionsMagnetic stimulation is effective for the treatment of urgency incontinence in female patients with overactive bladder.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMagnetic Field TherapyMedical RecordsMiddle AgedPainTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary Incontinence, UrgeUrineincontinencemagnetic stimulationoveractive bladderrandomizedurgency

Identifiers

PMID24118165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.