Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24118085›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2014

The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes.

Sophie Nolivos, David Sherratt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the energy landscape of bacterial chromosome segregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Purification and In Vitro Analysis of Escherichia coli RecN.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie NolivosDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David Sherratt

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT099204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are found in all three domains of life. They are characterized by a distinctive and conserved architecture in which a globular ATPase 'head' domain is formed by the N- and C-terminal regions of the SMC protein coming together, with a c. 50-nm-long antiparallel coiled-coil separating the head from a dimerization 'hinge'. Dimerization gives both V- and O-shaped SMC dimers. The distinctive architecture points to a conserved biochemical mechanism of action. However, the details of this mechanism are incomplete, and the precise ways in which this mechanism leads to the biological functions of these complexes in chromosome organization and processing remain unclear. In this review, we introduce the properties of bacterial SMC complexes, compare them with eukaryotic complexes and discuss how their likely biochemical action relates to their roles in chromosome organization and segregation.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChromosomes, BacterialBacterial Proteinschromosomechromosome organizationchromosome segregationcohesincondensinSMC

Identifiers

PMID24118085
PMCPMC4255302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.