Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24116833›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2014

[13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies.

Maysa Hussain, Morteza Jangorbhani, Sally Schuette, Robert V Considine, Robin L Chisholm, Kieren J Mather

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04623320 (Validation of a 13C Glucose Breath Test to Quantify Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Compared With the Euglycaemic Clamp Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04623320 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a 13C Glucose Breath Test to Quantify Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Compared With the Euglycaemic Clamp Test

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2020 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsInsulin Resistance, Type 1 DiabetesArmseuglycaemic clamp test, 13C glucose breath test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. European guideline on indications, performance and clinical impact ofUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Development of minimally invasiveMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2022
    Article
  4. Exogenous detection ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Induced volatolomics of pathologies.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maysa Hussain1 Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana.
Morteza Jangorbhani
Sally Schuette
Robert V Considine
Robin L Chisholm
Kieren J Mather

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExhaled (13)CO2 following ingestion of [(13)C]glucose with a standard oral glucose tolerance load correlates with blood glucose values but is determined by tissue glucose uptake. Therefore exhaled (13)CO2 may also be a surrogate measure of the whole-body glucose disposal rate (GDR) measured by the gold standard hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. SUBJECTS AND

methodsSubjects from across the glycemia range were studied on 2 consecutive days under fasting conditions. On Day 1, a 75-g oral glucose load spiked with [(13)C]glucose was administered. On Day 2, a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was performed. Correlations between breath parameters and clamp-derived GDR were evaluated, and calibration analyses were performed to evaluate the precision of breath parameter predictions of clamp measures.

resultsCorrelations of breath parameters with GDR and GDR per kilogram of fat-free mass (GDRffm) ranged from 0.54 to 0.61 and 0.54 to 0.66, respectively (all P<0.001). In calibration analyses the root mean square error for breath parameters predicting GDR and GDRffm ranged from 2.32 to 2.46 and from 3.23 to 3.51, respectively. Cross-validation prediction error (CVPE) estimates were 2.35-2.51 (GDR) and 3.29-3.57 (GDRffm). Prediction precision of breath enrichment at 180 min predicting GDR (CVPE=2.35) was superior to that for inverse insulin (2.68) and the Matsuda Index (2.51) but inferior to that for the log of homeostasis model assessment (2.21) and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (2.29) (all P<10(-5)). Similar patterns were seen for predictions of GDRffm.

conclusions(13)CO2 appearance in exhaled breath following a standard oral glucose load with added [(13)C]glucose provides a valid surrogate index of clamp-derived measures of whole-body insulin resistance, with good accuracy and precision. This noninvasive breath test-based approach can provide a useful measure of whole-body insulin resistance in physiologic and epidemiologic studies.

Indexed as

Breath TestsGlucose Clamp TechniqueInsulin ResistanceAdultAnalysis of VarianceCalibrationCarbon IsotopesFastingFemaleGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsCarbon IsotopesGlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24116833
PMCPMC3894703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.