Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24116602›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2013

Mechanisms and topology determination of complex chemical and biological network systems from first-passage theoretical approach.

Xin Li, Anatoly B Kolomeisky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Energy Landscapes of Model Knotted Polymers.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysing ill-conditioned Markov chains.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Dynamical Signatures of Multifunnel Energy Landscapes.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stochastic kinetics on networks: when slow is fast.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin LiDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA.
Anatoly B Kolomeisky

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Governing Cooperating MotorsR01GM094489 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM094489-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of chemical and biological processes can be viewed as complex networks of states connected by dynamic transitions. It is fundamentally important to determine the structure of these networks in order to fully understand the mechanisms of underlying processes. A new theoretical method of obtaining topologies and dynamic properties of complex networks, which utilizes a first-passage analysis, is developed. Our approach is based on a hypothesis that full temporal distributions of events between two arbitrary states contain full information on number of intermediate states, pathways, and transitions that lie between initial and final states. Several types of network systems are analyzed analytically and numerically. It is found that the approach is successful in determining structural and dynamic properties, providing a direct way of getting topology and mechanisms of general chemical network systems. The application of the method is illustrated on two examples of experimental studies of motor protein systems.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Motor ProteinsMonte Carlo MethodTime FactorsMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24116602
PMCPMC3808428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.