Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24116048›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile at a medical center in Taiwan: persistence of genetically clustering of A⁻B⁺ isolates and increase of A⁺B⁺ isolates.

Ju-Hsin Chia, Hsin-Chih Lai, Lin-Hui Su, An-Jing Kuo, Tsu-Lan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Retrospective Study of the Epidemiology ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  4. Genetic Relatedness of 5-Year Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Emerging microbes & infections · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clostridium difficile Infection.Microbiology spectrum · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ju-Hsin ChiaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan ; Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, Chang Gung University, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan ; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsin-Chih Lai
Lin-Hui Su
An-Jing Kuo
Tsu-Lan Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe investigated the changing trend of various toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates at a 3 500-bed hospital in Taiwan. Genetic relatedness and antimicrobial susceptibility of toxigenic C. difficile isolates were also examined.

methodsA total of 110 non-repeat toxigenic C. difficile isolates from different patients were collected between 2002 and 2007. Characterization of the 110 toxigenic isolates was performed using agar dilution method, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) genotyping, tcdC genotyping, and toxinotyping.

resultsAmong the 110 toxigenic isolates studied, 70 isolates harbored tcdA and tcdB (A⁺B⁺) and 40 isolates harbored tcdB only (A⁻B⁺). The annual number of A⁺B⁺ isolates considerably increased over the 6-year study (P = 0.055). A total of 109 different MLVA genotypes were identified, in which A⁺B⁺ isolates and A⁻B⁺ isolates were differentiated into two genetic clusters with similarity of 17.6%. Twenty-four (60%) of the 40 A⁻B⁺ isolates formed a major cluster, MLVA-group 1, with a similarity of 85%. Seven (6.4%) resistant isolates were identified, including two metronidazole-resistant and five vancomycin-resistant isolates.

conclusionsThis study indicated a persistence of a MLVA group 1 A⁻B⁺ isolates and an increase of A⁺B⁺ isolates with diverse MLVA types. Moreover, C. difficile isolates with antimicrobial resistance to metronidazole or vancomycin were found to have emerged. Continuous surveillance is warranted to understand the recent situation and control the further spread of the toxigenic C. difficile isolates, especially among hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesClostridioides difficileDrug Resistance, BacterialGenotypeHospitalsHumansMolecular EpidemiologyTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID24116048
PMCPMC3792110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.