Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24116028›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis: staples versus sutures for surgical procedures.

Karla Hemming, Thomas Pinkney, Kay Futaba, Mary Pennant, Dion G Morton, Richard J Lilford

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of reviews.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: a meta-review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case Study on Bevacizumab.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An Effective New Intestinal Anastomosis Method.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karla HemmingPublic Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Thomas Pinkney
Kay Futaba
Mary Pennant
Dion G Morton
Richard J Lilford
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham City University · GBNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically evaluate the evidence across surgical specialties as to whether staples or sutures better improve patient and provider level outcomes.

designA systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis of pooled estimates.

resultsEleven systematic reviews, including 13,661 observations, met the inclusion criteria. In orthopaedic surgery sutures were found to be preferable, and for appendicial stump sutures were protective against both surgical site infection and post surgical complications. However, staples were protective against leak in ilecolic anastomosis. For all other surgery types the evidence was inconclusive with wider confidence intervals including the possibly of preferential outcomes for surgical site infection or post surgical complication for either staples or sutures. Whilst reviews showed substantial variation in mean differences in operating time (I(2) 94%) there was clear evidence of a reduction in average operating time across all surgery types. Few reviews reported on length of stay, but the three reviews that did (I(2) 0%, including 950 observations) showed a non significant reduction in length of stay, but showed evidence of publication bias (P-value for Egger test 0.05).

conclusionsEvidence across surgical specialties indicates that wound closure with staples reduces the mean operating time. Despite including several thousand observations, no clear evidence of superiority emerged for either staples or sutures with respect to surgical site infection, post surgical complications, or length of stay.

Indexed as

HumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical StaplingSurgical Wound InfectionSuturesSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID24116028
PMCPMC3792070
OpenAlexW2113194079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.