Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114780›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of immunology2014

Tumor-specific CD4+ T cells maintain effector and memory tumor-specific CD8+ T cells.

Sarah E Church, Shawn M Jensen, Paul A Antony, Nicholas P Restifo, Bernard A Fox

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Multi-antigen spherical nucleic acid cancer vaccines.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intratumor childhood vaccine-specific CD4Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bystander CD4Oncoimmunology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E ChurchLaboratory of Molecular and Tumor Immunology, Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Shawn M Jensen
Paul A Antony
Nicholas P Restifo
Bernard A Fox
Providence Portland Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
INTERACTIONS AT THE MICROBE/HOST INTERFACET32AI007472 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LANDFEAR, SCOTT M · 1995 to 2019
$6.7M
MECHANISMS THAT REGULATE TUMOR SPECIFIC IMMUNE RESPONSESR01CA080964 · NCI · PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER · PI FOX, BERNARD A · 1999 to 2014
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS NCI CA 80564NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080964NIAID NIH HHS NIH T32 AI007472NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapies that augment antitumor T cells have had recent success for treating patients with cancer. Here we examined whether tumor-specific CD4(+) T cells enhance CD8(+) T-cell adoptive immunotherapy in a lymphopenic environment. Our model employed physiological doses of tyrosinase-related protein 1-specific CD4(+) transgenic T cells-CD4(+) T cells and pmel-CD8(+) T cells that when transferred individually were subtherapeutic; however, when transferred together provided significant (p ≤ 0.001) therapeutic efficacy. Therapeutic efficacy correlated with increased numbers of effector and memory CD8(+) T cells with tumor-specific cytokine expression. When combined with CD4(+) T cells, transfer of total (naïve and effector) or effector CD8(+) T cells were highly effective, suggesting CD4(+) T cells can help mediate therapeutic effects by maintaining function of activated CD8(+) T cells. In addition, CD4(+) T cells had a pronounced effect in the early posttransfer period, as their elimination within the first 3 days significantly (p < 0.001) reduced therapeutic efficacy. The CD8(+) T cells recovered from mice treated with both CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells had decreased expression of PD-1 and PD-1-blockade enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of pmel-CD8 alone, suggesting that CD4(+) T cells help reduce CD8(+) T-cell exhaustion. These data support combining immunotherapies that elicit both tumor-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells for treatment of patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell CommunicationCellular MicroenvironmentCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleImmunologic MemoryImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMelanoma, ExperimentalMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, KnockoutAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesMembrane GlycoproteinsOxidoreductasesPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTyrp1 protein, mouseCancer immunotherapyCD4+ T-cell helpMetastatic melanomaPD-1T cell

Identifiers

PMID24114780
PMCPMC4283993
OpenAlexW2156491299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.