Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114541›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

Stimulation of pontine reticular formation in monkeys with strabismus.

Mark M G Walton, Seiji Ono, Michael J Mustari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Electrical Microstimulation of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismic Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Abnormal activity of neurons in abducens nucleus of strabismic monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
  18. Vertical and oblique saccade disconjugacy in strabismus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark M G WaltonWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Seiji Ono
Michael J Mustari
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Visual Processing and Smooth Eye MovementsR01EY006069 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUSTARI, MICHAEL J · 1986 to 2018
$6.4M
Neural mechanisms for smooth pursuit adaptationR01EY019266 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ONO, SEIJI · 2008 to 2013
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY019266NEI NIH HHS EY06069NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006069NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019266NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIH HHS P51OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSaccade disconjugacy in strabismus could result from any of a number of factors, including abnormalities of eye muscles, the plant, motoneurons, near response cells, or atypical tuning of neurons in saccade-related areas of the brain. This study was designed to investigate the possibility that saccade disconjugacy in strabismus is associated with abnormalities in paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF).

methodsWe applied microstimulation to 22 sites in PPRF and 20 sites in abducens nucleus in three rhesus macaque monkeys (one normal, one esotrope, and one exotrope).

resultsWhen mean velocity was compared between the two eyes, a slight difference was found for 1/5 sites in the normal animal. Significant differences were found for 5/6 sites in an esotrope and 10/11 sites in an exotrope. For five sites in the strabismic monkeys, the directions of evoked movements differed by more than 40° between the two eyes. When stimulation was applied to abducens nucleus (20 sites), the ipsilateral eye moved faster for 4/6 sites in the normal animal and all nine sites in the esotrope. For the exotrope, however, the left eye always moved faster, even for three sites on the right side. For the strabismic animals, stimulation of abducens nucleus often caused a different eye to move faster than stimulation of PPRF.

conclusionsThese data suggest that PPRF is organized at least partly monocularly in strabismus and that disconjugate saccades are at least partly a consequence of unbalanced saccadic commands being sent to the two eyes.

Indexed as

Abducens NerveAnimalsElectric StimulationEsotropiaEvoked Potentials, VisualExotropiaFemaleMacaca mulattaReticular FormationSaccadesesotropiaexotropiaPPRFsaccadic eye movementsstrabismus

Identifiers

PMID24114541
PMCPMC3813322
OpenAlexW2091852212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.