Trial reportPhysical therapy2014
Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Profile: a preliminary look at responsiveness.
Trial report in Physical therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Walking Adaptability Training on Walking Capacity in Ambulatory People With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2024Trial
- Phase II/III placebo-controlled randomized trial of safety and efficacy of growth hormone treatment in incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2021Trial
- Training-Specific Neural Plasticity in Spinal Reflexes after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Neural plasticity · 2016Trial
- Interventions to Reduce Spasticity and Improve Function in People With Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Distinctions Revealed by Different Analytical Methods.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2015Trial
- Interrater reliability of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2023Article
- Validity and responsiveness of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for sub-acute traumatic spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2022Article
- H-reflex conditioning during locomotion in people with spinal cord injury.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Functional Gait Assessment in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2020Article
- The standing and walking assessment tool for individuals with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of validity and clinical use.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- Ambulation and physical function after eccentric resistance training in adults with incomplete spinal cord injury: A feasibility study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- Operant conditioning of the motor-evoked potential and locomotion in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Measuring balance confidence after spinal cord injury: the reliability and validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2017Article
- Effects of Seated Postural Stability and Trunk and Upper Extremity Strength on Performance during Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Tests in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: An Exploratory Study.Rehabilitation research and practice · 2016Article
- Walking adaptability after a stroke and its assessment in clinical settings.Stroke research and treatment · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Profile (SCI-FAP) is a valid, reliable measure of walking skill (eg, walking while negotiating obstacles, doors, and stairs).
objectiveThe responsiveness of the SCI-FAP was assessed at least 7 months after spinal cord injury (SCI) and compared with that of the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
designA secondary analysis of data collected during a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial was performed.
methodsParticipants had incomplete SCI and could walk at least 5 m without manual assistance. After 3 or 4 baseline assessments, participants completed 2 months of precision training (stepping over obstacles and onto targets on the ground) and 2 months of endurance training (treadmill training with body weight support, if needed). Walking function was assessed with the SCI-FAP, 10MWT, and 6MWT. Internal responsiveness was evaluated through change scores and standardized response means (SRMs). External responsiveness was gauged by correlating change scores on the SCI-FAP, 10MWT, and 6MWT. The minimal detectable change was calculated from the standard error of measurement from the baseline assessments.
resultsThe SCI-FAP scores improved with both interventions. The magnitude of change was greater for participants whose pretraining self-selected speed was less than 0.5 m/s. The SCI-FAP had moderate SRMs. The 10MWT (fastest speed) and 6MWT had the largest SRMs after precision training and endurance training, respectively. The minimal detectable change in the SCI-FAP was 96 points. LIMITATIONS: The convenience sample was small and all participants could ambulate independently (with devices); therefore, the generalizability of the findings is limited.
conclusionsThe SCI-FAP was responsive to changes in walking ability in participants who had incomplete SCI and walked at slow speeds, but overall the 10MWT and 6MWT were more responsive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.