Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114425›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Acute effects of mecamylamine and varenicline on cognitive performance in non-smokers with and without schizophrenia.

Sungwon Roh, Susanne S Hoeppner, David Schoenfeld, Catherine A Fullerton, Luke E Stoeckel, A Eden Evins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00455650 (Cognitive Effects of Mecamylamine and Varenicline in Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00455650 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Effects of Mecamylamine and Varenicline in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2007 to 2013Enrolled89ConditionsCognition in SchizophreniaArmsMecamylamine, Varenicline, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sungwon RohCenter for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 60 Staniford Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Susanne S Hoeppner
David Schoenfeld
Catherine A Fullerton
Luke E Stoeckel
A Eden Evins
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Mentoring in Addiction Treatment ResearchK24DA030443 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EVINS, A EDEN · 2010 to 2020
$2.0M
NICOTINE AND SMOKING CESSATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAK23DA000510 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EVINS, A EDEN · 2001 to 2005
$865k
Training in Patient-Oriented Neurobehavioral Addiction ResearchK23DA032612 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STOECKEL, LUKE · 2012 to 2014
$495k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA000510NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032612NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA030443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of cognitive deficits in the domains of attention and memory in schizophrenia. While nicotinic agonists and antagonists have been proposed as smoking cessation aids, few comparisons have been made of these agents on cognitive performance in individuals with schizophrenia.

objectivesThis study investigated the acute effects of a nAChR antagonist, mecamylamine, and partial agonist, varenicline, on cognitive function in non-smokers with and without schizophrenia.

methodsSingle oral doses of mecamylamine 10 mg, varenicline 1 mg, and placebo were administered 1 week apart in random order to adults with schizophrenia (n = 30) and to healthy volunteers (n = 41) in a double-blind, crossover design. The primary outcome of interest was sustained attention as assessed with hit reaction time variability (HRT-SD) on the identical pairs continuous performance test (CPT-IP).

resultsMecamylamine worsened performance on CPT-IP HRT-SD, a measure of attention, compared to varenicline in both groups. Performance on mecamylamine was worse than performance on both placebo and varenicline on several additional measures of attention, including CPT-IP hit reaction time (HRT) and random errors at various levels of task difficulty. There was a treatment by diagnosis interaction, such that mecamylamine worsened performance on CPT-IP 2-digit HRT, 3-digit random errors, and 4-digit hit rate compared to placebo and varenicline in participants with schizophrenia; effects not observed in controls.

conclusionsThese findings support a role for nAChRs in attention and suggest that those with schizophrenia may be particularly sensitive to nAChR blockade.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAdultAntipsychotic AgentsAttentionBenzazepinesCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMecamylamineMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzazepinesMecamylamineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsQuinoxalinesVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID24114425
PMCPMC4060791
OpenAlexW1963579626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.