Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114415›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013

Feedback modeling of non-esterified fatty acids in obese Zucker rats after nicotinic acid infusions.

Christine Ahlström, Tobias Kroon, Lambertus A Peletier, Johan Gabrielsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Feedback control indirect response models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling energy intake by adding homeostatic feedback and drug intervention.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Christine AhlströmCVMD iMed DMPK, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Pepparedsleden 1, 43183, Mölndal, Sweden, christine.ahlstrom@astrazeneca.com.
Tobias Kroon
Lambertus A Peletier
Johan Gabrielsson
AstraZeneca (Brazil) · BRAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBLeiden University · NLSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of disease on nicotinic acid (NiAc)-induced changes in plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). NiAc was given by constant intravenous infusion to normal Sprague-Dawley and obese Zucker rats, and arterial blood samples were taken for analysis of NiAc, NEFA, insulin and glucose plasma concentrations. The intravenous route was intentionally selected to avoid confounding processes, such as absorption, following extravascular administration. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM, version VI). The disposition of NiAc in the normal rats was described by a two-compartment model with endogenous synthesis of NiAc and two parallel capacity-limited elimination processes. In the obese rats disposition was described by a one-compartment model with endogenous synthesis of NiAc and one capacity-limited elimination process. The plasma concentration of NiAc drove NEFA (R) turnover via an inhibitory drug-mechanism function acting on the formation of NEFA. NEFA turnover was described by a feedback model with a moderator distributed over a series of transit compartments, where the first compartment (M 1 ) inhibited the formation of R and the last compartment (M N ) stimulated the loss of R. All processes regulating plasma NEFA concentrations were assumed to be captured by the moderator function. Differences in the pharmacodynamic response of the two strains included, in the obese animals, an increased NEFA baseline, diminished rebound and post-rebound oscillation, and a more pronounced slowly developing tolerance during the period of constant drug exposure. The feedback model captured the NiAc-induced changes in NEFA response in both the normal and obese rats. Differences in the parameter estimates between the obese and normal rats included, in the former group, increases in R 0 , k in and p by 44, 41 and 78 %, respectively, and decreases in k out and γ by 64 and 84 %, respectively. The estimates of k tol and IC 50 were similar in both groups. The NiAc-NEFA concentration-response relationship at equilibrium was substantially different in the two groups, being shifted upwards and to the right, and being shallower in the obese rats. The extent of such shifts is important, as they demonstrate the impact of disease at equilibrium and, if ignored, will lead to erroneous dose predictions and, in consequence, poorly designed studies. The proposed models are primarily aimed at screening and selecting candidates with the highest potential of becoming a viable drug in man.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalModels, BiologicalAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFatty Acids, NonesterifiedInfusions, IntravenousMaleNiacinObesityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRats, ZuckerTime FactorsTissue DistributionFatty Acids, NonesterifiedNiacin

Identifiers

PMID24114415
OpenAlexW2058698845

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.