Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114319›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2013

An attempt to validate the modification of the American-European consensus definition of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome by the Berlin definition in a university hospital.

R Hernu, F Wallet, F Thiollière, O Martin, J C Richard, Z Schmitt, G Wallon, B Delannoy, T Rimmelé, C Démaret and 12 more

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Predictive Value of the PaOInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021.Journal of intensive care · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. P/FP ratio: incorporation of PEEP into the PaOAnnals of intensive care · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

R HernuService de Réanimation Médicale, Pavillon N, Groupement Hospitalier Edouard-Herriot, CHU de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon et Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
F Wallet
F Thiollière
O Martin
J C Richard
Z Schmitt
G Wallon
B Delannoy
T Rimmelé
C Démaret
C Magnin
H Vallin
A Lepape
L Baboi
L Argaud
V Piriou
B Allaouchiche
F Aubrun
O Bastien
J J Lehot
L Ayzac
C Guérin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a new proposal for changing the American-European consensus definition but has not been assessed prospectively as yet. In the present study, we aimed to determine (1) the prevalence and incidence of ARDS with both definitions, and (2) the initial characteristics of patients with ARDS and 28-day mortality with the Berlin definition.

methodsWe performed a 6-month prospective observational study in the ten adult ICUs affiliated to the Public University Hospital in Lyon, France, from March to September 2012. Patients under invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, with PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg regardless of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level, and acute onset of new or increased bilateral infiltrates or opacities on chest X-ray were screened from ICU admission up to discharge. Patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema were excluded. Patients were further classified into specific categories by using the American-European Consensus Conference and the Berlin definition criteria. The complete data set was measured at the time of inclusion. Patient outcome was measured at day 28 after inclusion.

resultsDuring the study period 3,504 patients were admitted and 278 fulfilled the American-European Consensus Conference criteria. Among them, 18 (6.5 %) did not comply with the Berlin criterion PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O and 20 (7.2 %) had PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤200 while on noninvasive ventilation. By using the Berlin definition in the remaining 240 patients (n = 42 mild, n = 123 moderate, n = 75 severe), the overall prevalence was 6.85 % and it was 1.20, 3.51, and 2.14 % for mild, moderate, and severe ARDS, respectively (P > 0.05 between the three groups). The incidence of ARDS amounted to 32 per 100,000 population per year, with values for mild, moderate, and severe ARDS of 5.6, 16.3, and 10 per 100,000 population per year, respectively (P < 0.05 between the three groups). The 28-day mortality was 35.0 %. It amounted to 30.9 % in mild, 27.9 % in moderate, and 49.3 % in severe categories (P < 0.01 between mild or moderate and severe, P = 0.70 between mild and moderate). In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis ARDS stage was not significantly associated with patient death at day 28.

conclusionsThe present study did not validate the Berlin definition of ARDS. Neither the stratification by severity nor the PaO2/FiO2 at study entry was independently associated with mortality.

Indexed as

Hospitals, UniversityAcute Lung InjuryAgedConsensus Statements as TopicEuropeFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationPrevalenceProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.