Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114196›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2014

Is the negative relationship between obesity and bone mineral content greater for older women?

Wankyo Chung, Jongseok Lee, Ohk-Hyun Ryu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wankyo ChungCollege of Business, Hallym University, Chuncheon-si, South Korea.
Jongseok Lee
Ohk-Hyun Ryu
Hallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity and osteoporosis are two important body composition problems with increasing prevalences in aged populations. Traditionally, obesity has been regarded as being beneficial to bone health. However, the protective effect of obesity on osteoporosis has been questioned. In some recent studies, obesity, as defined by percentage body fat, was regarded as a risk factor for osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the effect of waist circumference, a surrogate measure for abdominal obesity, on bone mineral content (BMC) and (2) examine whether the effect of waist circumference increases with advancing age. The study population is made up of women aged over 45 years who completed the body composition and bone mineral density examinations in the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010. Subjects who take estrogen or are under medical treatment for osteoporosis were excluded. Stroke patients are also excluded. Femoral neck, total-hip, and whole-body BMC were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. A total of 1,434 subjects were included in the analysis. Waist circumference was negatively associated with BMC in all tested regions after correction for weight, menopausal status, smoking, drinking, and exercise. In addition, the negative association between waist circumference and BMC in the femoral neck and total hip increases with age, after correction for confounding factors, showing an interaction effect between waist circumference and age on BMC. In conclusion, this study shows that the negative relationship between waist circumference and BMC in the femoral neck and total hip is greater for older women.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMiddle AgedObesityWaist Circumference

Identifiers

PMID24114196
OpenAlexW2073955165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.