Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2014
Effects of novel cathepsin K inhibitor ONO-5334 on bone resorption markers: a study of four sustained release formulations with different pharmacokinetic patterns.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antiresorptive effect of a cathepsin K inhibitor ONO-5334 and its relationship to BMD increase in a phase II trial for postmenopausal osteoporosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Trial
- Small-molecule Cathepsin K inhibitors: a medicinal chemistry perspective.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Perspectives on osteoporosis therapies.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was clarify the effect of the cathepsin K inhibitor ONO-5334 on bone resortion markers using sustained release (SR) formulations with different pharmacokinetic (PK) patterns, and identify the optimal SR formulation. The PK profiles and pharmacodynamic effect on bone resorption markers of 4 SR candidates formulations were evaluated in healthy postmenopausal women within a randomized, 2-part, open-label crossover study. In Part A, subject received a single dose of each formulation orally in the fed state. In Part B, two selected formulations were evaluated in the fasted state. From the results from Part A, C(max) was reduced and plasma concentrations of ONO-5334 were sustained with all SR formulations compared with an immediate release tablet. In pharmacodynamics, the level of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) in serum and urine were inhibited with SR tablets rather than with granules. C max and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC(0-t)) of SR tablets were higher than those of granules. From Part B, C max in the fasted condition was lower than that in the fed condition with two SR tablets. In contrast, C(24 h) in the fasted condition was slightly higher than that in the fed condition, but AUC(0-t) was similar. The inhibitory effect on CTX in serum and urine may depend on the PK pattern of ONO-5334. The SR tablets was well tolerated in postmenopausal women and has the optimal SR profiles on pharmacodynamics effect on bone resortion markers and PK profile. These results suggest that SR tablets of ONO-5334 are an excellent drug candidate for osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24114194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.