Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24114145›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2013

Understanding the anatomy of dystonia: determinants of penetrance and phenotype.

Renata P Lerner, Martin Niethammer, David Eidelberg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain network pathophysiology in dystonia.Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of dopamine and dopaminergic pathways in dystonia: insights from neuroimaging.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renata P LernerCenter for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Martin Niethammer
David Eidelberg
Center for Neurosciences · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Structure-Function Relationships in Dystonia: A Network ApproachR01NS072514 · NINDS · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI EIDELBERG, DAVID · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dystonias comprise a group of syndromes characterized by prolonged involuntary muscle contractions resulting in repetitive movements and abnormal postures. Primary dystonia has been associated with over 14 different genotypes, most of which follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with reduced penetrance. Independent of etiology, the disease is characterized by extensive variability in disease phenotype and clinical severity. Recent neuroimaging studies investigating this phenomenon in manifesting and non-manifesting genetic carriers of dystonia have discovered microstructural integrity differences in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical tract in both groups related to disease penetrance. Further study suggests these differences to be specific to subrolandic white matter regions somatotopically related to clinical phenotype. Clinical severity was correlated to the degree of microstructural change. These findings suggest a mechanism for the penetrance and clinical variability observed in dystonia and may represent a novel therapeutic target for patients with refractory limb symptoms.

Indexed as

ComprehensionPenetrancePhenotypeAnimalsDystoniaHumans

Identifiers

PMID24114145
PMCPMC3883436
OpenAlexW2046104047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.