Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24113857›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2013

The scientific basis for chelation: animal studies and lead chelation.

Donald Smith, Barbara J Strupp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The effect of diosmin against lead exposure in ratsNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current use of chelation in American health care.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2013
    Review
  10. Medical toxicology case presentations: to chelate or not to chelate, is that the question?Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2013
    Article
  11. The role of chelation in the treatment of arsenic and mercury poisoning.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald SmithMicrobiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, drsmith@ucsc.edu.
Barbara J Strupp
Cornell University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND TOXICOLOGY: PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH CONU61TS000117 · TS · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY · PI KOSNETT, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2013
$587k
SUPERFUND BASIC RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAMP42ES005950 · NIEHS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI HOSLSTEN, RICHARD D · 1992 to 2000
$114k
SUCCIMER REDUCTION OF TISSUE PB AND TOXICITYR01ES006918 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI LAUGHLIN, NELLIE K · 1994 to 2000
$76k
SUCCIMER EFFECTS--BRAIN REGION PB &GI PB ABSORPTIONF32ES005870 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI CREMIN, JOHN D · 1999 to 2000
$31k
EFFECACY OF DMSA IN REDUCING BRAIN AND TISSUE LEADR01ES007457 · NIEHS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI STRUPP, BARBARA J · 1995 to 1999
–
BONE PB TOXICITY AND REMOBILIZATION IN RATSR01ES007535 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SMITH, DONALD R · 1995 to 1996
–
ATSDR CDC HHS 1U61TS000117-04ATSDR CDC HHS U61 TS000117NIDDK NIH HHS DK0715827NIEHS NIH HHS ES05950NIEHS NIH HHS ES07457NIEHS NIH HHS ES07535NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES005870NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES05870NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES06918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This presentation summarizes several of the rodent and non-human studies that we have conducted to help inform the efficacy and clinical utility of succimer (meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccincinic acid) chelation treatment. We address the following questions: (1) What is the extent of body lead, and in particular brain lead reduction with chelation, and do reductions in blood lead accurately reflect reductions in brain lead? (2) Can succimer treatment alleviate the neurobehavioral impacts of lead poisoning? And (3) does succimer treatment, in the absence of lead poisoning, produce neurobehavioral deficits? Results from our studies in juvenile primates show that succimer treatment is effective at accelerating the elimination of lead from the body, but chelation was only marginally better than the complete cessation of lead exposure alone. Studies in lead-exposed adult primates treated with a single 19-day course of succimer showed that chelation did not measurably reduce brain lead levels compared to vehicle-treated controls. A follow-up study in rodents that underwent one or two 21-day courses of succimer treatment showed that chelation significantly reduced brain lead levels, and that two courses of succimer were significantly more efficacious at reducing brain lead levels than one. In both the primate and rodent studies, reductions in blood lead levels were a relatively poor predictor of reductions in brain lead levels. Our studies in rodents demonstrated that it is possible for succimer chelation therapy to alleviate certain types of lead-induced behavioral/cognitive dysfunction, suggesting that if a succimer treatment protocol that produced a substantial reduction of brain lead levels could be identified for humans, a functional benefit might be derived. Finally, we also found that succimer treatment produced lasting adverse neurobehavioral effects when administered to non-lead-exposed rodents, highlighting the potential risks of administering succimer or other metal-chelating agents to children who do not have elevated tissue lead levels. It is of significant concern that this type of therapy has been advocated for treating autism.

Indexed as

Chelation TherapyAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBody BurdenBrainChelating AgentsDisease Models, AnimalHumansLeadLead PoisoningRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSuccimerTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeChelating AgentsLeadSuccimer

Identifiers

PMID24113857
PMCPMC3846979
OpenAlexW2005943740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.