Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24113599›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2013

The effect of a hospital-wide urine culture screening intervention on the incidence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species.

Jennifer H Han, Warren B Bilker, Irving Nachamkin, Theoklis E Zaoutis, Susan E Coffin, Darren R Linkin, Baofeng Hu, Pam Tolomeo, Neil O Fishman, Ebbing Lautenbach

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer H HanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Warren B Bilker
Irving Nachamkin
Theoklis E Zaoutis
Susan E Coffin
Darren R Linkin
Baofeng Hu
Pam Tolomeo
Neil O Fishman
Ebbing Lautenbach

Funding

Novel Application of Infection Control Strategies to Limit Transmission of ESBL'SR01CI000389 · CI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2006 to 2008
$862k
Mentoring and patient-oriented research in antimicrobial resistanceK24AI080942 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2009 to 2013
$853k
ACL HHS U54CK000163Intramural NIH HHSNCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000163NCEZID CDC HHS U54-CK000163NCPDCID CDC HHS R01 CI000389NCPDCID CDC HHS R01-CI000389NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI080942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOptimal strategies for limiting the transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp (ESBL-EK) in the hospital setting remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a urine culture screening strategy on the incidence of ESBL-EK.

designProspective quasi-experimental study.

settingTwo intervention hospitals and one control hospital within a university health system from 2005 to 2009. PATIENTS AND

interventionAll clinical urine cultures with E. coli or Klebsiella spp were screened for ESBL-EK. Patients determined to be colonized or infected with ESBL-EK were placed in a private room with contact precautions. The primary outcome of interest was nosocomial ESBL-EK incidence in nonurinary clinical cultures (cases occurring more than 48 hours after admission). Changes in monthly ESBL-EK incidence rates were evaluated with mixed-effects Poisson regression models, with adjustment for institution-level characteristics (eg, total admissions).

resultsThe overall incidence of ESBL-EK increased from 1.42/10,000 patient-days to 2.16/10,000 patient-days during the study period. The incidence of community-acquired ESBL-EK increased nearly 3-fold, from 0.33/10,000 patient-days to 0.92/10,000 patient-days (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, the intervention was not significantly associated with a reduction in nosocomial ESBL-EK incidence (incidence rate ratio, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 0.83-2.31]; P - .21).

conclusionsUniversal screening of clinical urine cultures for ESBL-EK did not result in a reduction in nosocomial ESBL-EK incidence rates, most likely because of increases in importation of ESBL-EK cases from the community. Further studies are needed on elucidating optimal infection control interventions to limit spread of ESBL-producing organisms in the hospital setting.

Indexed as

Bacteriuriabeta-LactamasesCross InfectionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsHumansIncidenceInfection ControlKlebsiellaKlebsiella InfectionsMass ScreeningUrinebeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID24113599
PMCPMC3981746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.