ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
Strong heterogeneity in mutation rate causes misleading hallmarks of natural selection on indel mutations in the human genome.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- MuRaL-indel: a deep learning framework for building insertion and deletion mutation rate maps.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Multispecies pangenomes reveal a pervasive influence of population size on structural variation.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Comparative population pangenomes reveal unexpected complexity and fitness effects of structural variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A Probabilistic Model for Indel Evolution: Differentiating Insertions from Deletions.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Impact of Natural Selection on Short Insertion and Deletion Variation in the Great Tit Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Using the Neandertal genome to study the evolution of small insertions and deletions in modern humans.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Human adaptation and population differentiation in the light of ancient genomes.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Genomic variations and distinct evolutionary rate of rare alleles in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Selection on a variant associated with improved viral clearance drives local, adaptive pseudogenization of interferon lambda 4 (IFNL4).PLoS genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidating the mechanisms of mutation accumulation and fixation is critical to understand the nature of genetic variation and its contribution to genome evolution. Of particular interest is the effect of insertions and deletions (indels) on the evolution of genome landscapes. Recent population-scaled sequencing efforts provide unprecedented data for analyzing the relative impact of selection versus nonadaptive forces operating on indels. Here, we combined McDonald-Kreitman tests with the analysis of derived allele frequency spectra to investigate the dynamics of allele fixation of short (1-50 bp) indels in the human genome. Our analyses revealed apparently higher fixation probabilities for insertions than deletions. However, this fixation bias is not consistent with either selection or biased gene conversion and varies with local mutation rate, being particularly pronounced at indel hotspots. Furthermore, we identified an unprecedented number of loci with evidence for multiple indel events in the primate phylogeny. Even in nonrepetitive sequence contexts (a priori not prone to indel mutations), such loci are 60-fold more frequent than expected according to a model of uniform indel mutation rate. This provides evidence of as yet unidentified cryptic indel hotspots. We propose that indel homoplasy, at known and cryptic hotspots, produces systematic errors in determination of ancestral alleles via parsimony and advise caution interpreting classic selection tests given the strong heterogeneity in indel rates across the genome. These results will have great impact on studies seeking to infer evolutionary forces operating on indels observed in closely related species, because such mutations are traditionally presumed homoplasy-free.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.