Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24113403›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2013

The footprint of old syphilis: using a reverse screening algorithm for syphilis testing in a U.S. Geographic Information Systems-Based Community Outreach Program.

Neela D Goswami, Jason E Stout, William C Miller, Emily J Hecker, Gary M Cox, Brianna L Norton, Arlene C Sena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Screening Veterans for Syphilis: Implementation of the Reverse Sequence Algorithm.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neela D GoswamiFrom the *Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and †Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jason E Stout
William C Miller
Emily J Hecker
Gary M Cox
Brianna L Norton
Arlene C Sena

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Susanna Naggie, GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of syphilis reverse sequence screening has not been evaluated in community outreach. Using reverse sequence screening in neighborhoods identified with geographic information systems, we found that among 239 participants, 45 (19%) were seropositive. Of these, 3 (7%) had untreated syphilis, 33 (73%) had previously treated syphilis infection, and 9 (20%) had negative nontreponemal test results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultCommunity-Institutional RelationsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeographic Information SystemsHumansMaleMass ScreeningNorth CarolinaSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidum

Identifiers

PMID24113403
PMCPMC4280062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.