ArticleBehavioural processes2014
Phase resetting and its implications for interval timing with intruders.
Article in Behavioural processes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- mPFC catecholamines modulate attentional capture by appetitive distracters and attention to time in a peak-interval procedure in rats.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Is the scalar property of interval timing preserved after hippocampus lesions?Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Scalar timing in memory: A temporal map in the hippocampus.Journal of theoretical biology · 2018Article
- Sex differences in interval timing and attention to time in C57Bl/6J mice.Behavioural brain research · 2017Article
- Article
- Emotional modulation of interval timing and time perception.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016Review
- Clocks within Clocks: Timing by Coincidence Detection.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2016Article
- Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Review
- Why noise is useful in functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing?BMC neuroscience · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time perception in the second-to-minutes range is crucial for fundamental cognitive processes like decision making, rate calculation, and planning. We used a striatal beat frequency (SBF) computational model to predict the response of an interval timing network to intruders, such as gaps in conditioning stimulus (CS), or distracters presented during the uninterrupted CS. We found that, depending on the strength of the input provided to neural oscillators by the intruder, the SBF model can either ignore it or reset timing. The significant delays in timing produced by emotionally charged distracters were numerically simulated by a strong phase resetting of all neural oscillators involved in the SBF network for the entire duration of the evoked response. The combined effect of emotional distracter and pharmacological manipulations was modeled in our SBF model by modulating the firing frequencies of neural oscillators after they are released from inhibition due to emotional distracters. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: SI: Associative and Temporal Learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.