Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24112693›Full record

ReviewBMC pediatrics2013

Exogenous surfactant therapy in 2013: what is next? Who, when and how should we treat newborn infants in the future?

Emmanuel Lopez, Géraldine Gascoin, Cyril Flamant, Mona Merhi, Pierre Tourneux, Olivier Baud, French Young Neonatologist Club

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel LopezRéanimation et Pédiatrie Néonatales, Groupe Hospitalier Robert Debré, APHP, 48 Bd Sérurier, Paris, 75019, France. olivier.baud@rdb.aphp.fr.
Géraldine Gascoin
Cyril Flamant
Mona Merhi
Pierre Tourneux
Olivier Baud
French Young Neonatologist Club
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurfactant therapy is one of the few treatments that have dramatically changed clinical practice in neonatology. In addition to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), surfactant deficiency is observed in many other clinical situations in term and preterm infants, raising several questions regarding the use of surfactant therapy.

objectivesThis review focuses on several points of interest, including some controversial or confusing topics being faced by clinicians together with emerging or innovative concepts and techniques, according to the state of the art and the published literature as of 2013. Surfactant therapy has primarily focused on RDS in the preterm newborn. However, whether this treatment would be of benefit to a more heterogeneous population of infants with lung diseases other than RDS needs to be determined. Early trials have highlighted the benefits of prophylactic surfactant administration to newborns judged to be at risk of developing RDS. In preterm newborns that have undergone prenatal lung maturation with steroids and early treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the criteria for surfactant administration, including the optimal time and the severity of RDS, are still under discussion. Tracheal intubation is no longer systematically done for surfactant administration to newborns. Alternative modes of surfactant administration, including minimally-invasive and aerosolized delivery, could thus allow this treatment to be used in cases of RDS in unstable preterm newborns, in whom the tracheal intubation procedure still poses an ethical and medical challenge.

conclusionThe optimization of the uses and methods of surfactant administration will be one of the most important challenges in neonatal intensive care in the years to come.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalLung DiseasesPulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID24112693
PMCPMC3851818
OpenAlexW2067257064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.