Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24109599›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2013

Repressed synthesis of ribosomal proteins generates protein-specific cell cycle and morphological phenotypes.

Mamata Thapa, Ananth Bommakanti, Md Shamsuzzaman, Brian Gregory, Leigh Samsel, Janice M Zengel, Lasse Lindahl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ribosomal protein S25 promotes cell cycle entry for a productive BK polyomavirus infection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The homeostatic regulation of ribosome biogenesis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Metabolomic and Proteomic Changes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mamata ThapaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 Flow Cytometry Core Facility, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Ananth Bommakanti
Md Shamsuzzaman
Brian Gregory
Leigh Samsel
Janice M Zengel
Lasse Lindahl
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

EXPAND PARTICIPATION BY MINORITIES IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCER25GM055036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI SUMMERS, MICHAEL FINLEY · 1996 to 2021
$16.9M
Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311NIGMS NIH HHS P41-GM103311NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM055036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biogenesis of ribosomes is coordinated with cell growth and proliferation. Distortion of the coordinated synthesis of ribosomal components affects not only ribosome formation, but also cell fate. However, the connection between ribosome biogenesis and cell fate is not well understood. To establish a model system for inquiries into these processes, we systematically analyzed cell cycle progression, cell morphology, and bud site selection after repression of 54 individual ribosomal protein (r-protein) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that repression of nine 60S r-protein genes results in arrest in the G2/M phase, whereas repression of nine other 60S and 22 40S r-protein genes causes arrest in the G1 phase. Furthermore, bud morphology changes after repression of some r-protein genes. For example, very elongated buds form after repression of seven 60S r-protein genes. These genes overlap with, but are not identical to, those causing the G2/M cell cycle phenotype. Finally, repression of most r-protein genes results in changed sites of bud formation. Strikingly, the r-proteins whose repression generates similar effects on cell cycle progression cluster in the ribosome physical structure, suggesting that different topological areas of the precursor and/or mature ribosome are mechanistically connected to separate aspects of the cell cycle.

Indexed as

Cell CycleProtein BiosynthesisCell NucleusDNA, FungalFlow CytometryModels, BiologicalPhenotypeRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA, FungalRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24109599
PMCPMC3842990
OpenAlexW2120301479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.