Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24109592›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2013

Host specialization in ticks and transmission of tick-borne diseases: a review.

Karen D McCoy, Elsa Léger, Muriel Dietrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tick Diversity Associated with the European Brown Hare (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Drivers of tick community structure in a rhinoceros meta-population in Kenya.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ecological review of AfrotropicalCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Insights into Vector-Pathogen Adaptation inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karen D McCoyMiVEGEC, Mixed Research Unit 5290 CNRS-IRD-UM1-UM2, Centre IRD Montpellier, France ; Department of Biology, Carleton University Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Elsa Léger
Muriel Dietrich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining patterns of host use, and the frequency at which these patterns change, are of key importance if we are to understand tick population dynamics, the evolution of tick biodiversity, and the circulation and evolution of associated pathogens. The question of whether ticks are typically host specialists or host generalists has been subject to much debate over the last half-century. Indeed, early research proposed that morphological diversity in ticks was linked to host specific adaptations and that most ticks were specialists. Later work disputed this idea and suggested that ticks are largely limited by biogeographic conditions and tend to use all locally available host species. The work presented in this review suggests that the actual answer likely lies somewhere between these two extremes. Although recent observational studies support the view that phylogenetically diverse host species share ticks when found on similar ecological ranges, theory on host range evolution predicts that host specialization should evolve in ticks given their life history characteristics. Contemporary work employing population genetic tools to examine host-associated population structure in several tick systems support this prediction and show that simple species records are not enough to determine whether a parasite is a true host generalist; host specialization does evolve in ticks at local scales, but may not always lead to speciation. Ticks therefore seem to follow a pattern of being global generalists, local specialists. Given this, the notion of host range needs to be modified from an evolutionary perspective, where one simply counts the number of hosts used across the geographic distribution, to a more ecological view, where one considers host use at a local scale, if we are to better understand the circulation of tick-borne pathogens and exposure risks for humans and livestock.

Indexed as

Host SpecificityAnimalsBiotaGeographyHumansTick-Borne DiseasesTicksadaptationArgasidaeBorrelia burgdorferi sensu latocommunity diversityepidemiologyIxodidaepopulation genetic structuretransmission

Identifiers

PMID24109592
PMCPMC3790072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.