ArticleFrontiers in genetics2013
The effects of transcription factor competition on gene regulation.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-channel optogenetics in yeast for multiplexed light-based control of cellular processes and pathways.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dynamic barriers modulate cohesin positioning and genome folding at fixed occupancy.Genome research · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the REST transcription factor regulatory networks in IDH mutant and IDH wild-type glioma cell lines and tumors.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Development of a compact bidirectional promoter-driven dual chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) construct targeting CD19 and CD20 in the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Article
- Deep molecular learning of transcriptional control of a synthetic CRE enhancer and its variants.iScience · 2024Article
- Emergent correlations in gene expression dynamics as footprints of resource competition.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021Article
- Preferential CEBP binding to T:G mismatches and increased C-to-T human somatic mutations.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- From reads to insight: a hitchhiker's guide to ATAC-seq data analysis.Genome biology · 2020Review
- Tissue-Specific Actions of Pax6 on Proliferation and Differentiation Balance in Developing Forebrain Are Foxg1 Dependent.iScience · 2018Article
- Transcription factor target site search and gene regulation in a background of unspecific binding sites.Journal of theoretical biology · 2018Article
- Single-cell epigenomic variability reveals functional cancer heterogeneity.Genome biology · 2017Article
- Real sequence effects on the search dynamics of transcription factors on DNA.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Facilitated diffusion buffers noise in gene expression.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2014Article
- Physical constraints determine the logic of bacterial promoter architectures.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- p53 binding to human genome: crowd control navigation in chromatin context.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factor (TF) molecules translocate by facilitated diffusion (a combination of 3D diffusion around and 1D random walk on the DNA). Despite the attention this mechanism received in the last 40 years, only a few studies investigated the influence of the cellular environment on the facilitated diffusion mechanism and, in particular, the influence of "other" DNA binding proteins competing with the TF molecules for DNA space. Molecular crowding on the DNA is likely to influence the association rate of TFs to their target site and the steady state occupancy of those sites, but it is still not clear how it influences the search in a genome-wide context, when the model includes biologically relevant parameters (such as: TF abundance, TF affinity for DNA and TF dynamics on the DNA). We performed stochastic simulations of TFs performing the facilitated diffusion mechanism, and considered various abundances of cognate and non-cognate TFs. We show that, for both obstacles that move on the DNA and obstacles that are fixed on the DNA, changes in search time are not statistically significant in case of biologically relevant crowding levels on the DNA. In the case of non-cognate proteins that slide on the DNA, molecular crowding on the DNA always leads to statistically significant lower levels of occupancy, which may confer a general mechanism to control gene activity levels globally. When the "other" molecules are immobile on the DNA, we found a completely different behavior, namely: the occupancy of the target site is always increased by higher molecular crowding on the DNA. Finally, we show that crowding on the DNA may increase transcriptional noise through increased variability of the occupancy time of the target sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.