Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24109433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2013

Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Chiara Verpelli, Luigi Carlessi, Giulia Bechi, Elena Fusar Poli, Daniel Orellana, Christopher Heise, Silvana Franceschetti, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Mantegazza, Domenico Delia and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The X-Linked Intellectual Disability Protein IL1RAPL1 Regulates Dendrite Complexity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chiara VerpelliCNR Institute of Neuroscience and Department of Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan Milan, Italy.
Luigi Carlessi
Giulia Bechi
Elena Fusar Poli
Daniel Orellana
Christopher Heise
Silvana Franceschetti
Renato Mantegazza
Massimo Mantegazza
Domenico Delia
Carlo Sala

Funding

Telethon GGP11095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro models able to recapitulate the human pathology as closely as possible. Here we compared three different differentiation protocols for obtaining functional neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs): human neural progenitors (hNPs) obtained from hiPSCs were differentiated by co-culturing them with rat primary neurons, glial cells or simply by culturing them on matrigel in neuronal differentiation medium, and the differentiation level was compared using immunofluorescence, biochemical and electrophysiological methods. We show that the differentiated neurons displayed distinct maturation properties depending on the protocol used and the faster morphological and functional maturation was obtained when hNPs were co-cultured with rat primary neurons.

Indexed as

Human neuronsinduced pluripotent stem cellsneuronal differentiationpostsynapsesynapse formation

Identifiers

PMID24109433
PMCPMC3791383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.