Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108793›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Thalamostriatal projections from the medial posterior and parafascicular nuclei have distinct topographic and physiologic properties.

Kevin D Alloway, Jared B Smith, Glenn D R Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The parafascicular thalamus steers attention to facilitate learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Modulation and Gating of Transthalamic and Subcortical Pathways through Somatosensory Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A Role for the Claustrum in Salience Processing?Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019
    Article
  18. Striatum Involvement in LGI1 Limbic Encephalitis.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin D AllowayDepartment of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and.
Jared B Smith
Glenn D R Watson

Funding

Somatosensory Cortical Influences on Subcortical ProcessingR01NS037532 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ALLOWAY, KEVIN DOUGLAS · 1999 to 2010
$2.8M
Somatosensory Cortical Influences on Subcortical ProcessingR56NS037532 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ALLOWAY, KEVIN DOUGLAS · 2007 to 2007
$327k
NINDS NIH HHS NS-37532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dorsolateral striatum (DLS) is critical for executing sensorimotor behaviors that depend on stimulus-response (S-R) associations. In rats, the DLS receives it densest inputs from primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, but it also receives substantial input from the thalamus. Much of rat DLS is devoted to processing whisker-related information, and thalamic projections to these whisker-responsive DLS regions originate from the parafascicular (Pf) and medial posterior (POm) nuclei. To determine which thalamic nucleus is better suited for mediating S-R associations in the DLS, we compared their input-output connections and neuronal responses to repetitive whisker stimulation. Tracing experiments demonstrate that POm projects specifically to the DLS, but the Pf innervates both dorsolateral and dorsomedial parts of the striatum. The Pf nucleus is innervated by whisker-sensitive sites in the superior colliculus, and these sites also send dense projections to the zona incerta, a thalamic region that sends inhibitory projections to the POm. These data suggest that projections from POm to the DLS are suppressed by incertal inputs when the superior colliculus is activated by unexpected sensory stimuli. Simultaneous recordings with two electrodes indicate that POm neurons are more responsive and habituate significantly less than Pf neurons during repetitive whisker stimulation. Response latencies are also shorter in POm than in Pf, which is consistent with the fact that Pf receives its whisker information via synaptic relays in the superior colliculus. These findings indicate that, compared with the Pf nucleus, POm transmits somatosensory information to the DLS with a higher degree of sensory fidelity.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsCorpus StriatumEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeThalamic NucleiVibrissaebasal gangliahabituationneuronal latencyneuronal tracingwhisker stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24108793
PMCPMC3921371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.