Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108779›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Immunogenicity and safety after booster vaccination of diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis in young adults: an open randomized controlled trial in Japan.

Megumi Hara, Kenji Okada, Yuko Yamaguchi, Shingo Uno, Yasuko Otsuka, Chisato Shimanoe, Hinako Nanri, Mikako Horita, Iwata Ozaki, Yuichiro Nishida and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megumi HaraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga City, Japan.
Kenji Okada
Yuko Yamaguchi
Shingo Uno
Yasuko Otsuka
Chisato Shimanoe
Hinako Nanri
Mikako Horita
Iwata Ozaki
Yuichiro Nishida
Keitaro Tanaka
Saga University · JPKaketsuken (Japan) · JPFukuoka Dental College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent increase of pertussis in young adults in Japan is hypothesized to be due in part to waning protection from the acellular pertussis vaccine. While a booster immunization may prevent an epidemic of pertussis among these young adults, little is known about the safety and immunogenicity of such a booster with the diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), which is currently available in Japan. One hundred and eleven medical students with a mean age of 19.4 years were randomly divided into 2 groups of 55 and 56 subjects and received, respectively, 0.2 or 0.5 ml of DTaP. Immunogenicity was assessed by performing the immunoassay using serum, and the geometric mean concentration (GMC), GMC ratio (GMCR), seropositive rate, and booster response rate were calculated. Adverse reactions and adverse events were monitored for 7 days after vaccination. After booster vaccination in the two groups, significant increases were found in the antibodies against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, diphtheria toxoid, and tetanus toxoid, and the booster response rates for all subjects reached 100%. The GMCs and GMCRs against all antigens were significantly higher in the 0.5-ml group than in the 0.2-ml group. No serious adverse events were observed. Frequencies of local reactions were similar in the 2 groups, although the frequency of severe local swelling was significantly higher in the 0.5-ml group. These data support the acceptability of booster immunization using both 0.2 and 0.5 ml of DTaP for young adults for controlling pertussis. (This study was registered at UMIN-CTR under registration number UMIN000010672.).

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheriaDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunoassayJapanMaleSerologic TestsTetanusVaccinationVaccines, AcellularWhooping CoughYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineVaccines, Acellular

Identifiers

PMID24108779
PMCPMC3889508
OpenAlexW2156486159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.