Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108778›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Evaluation of a prototype flow cytometry test for serodiagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Henrique Gama Ker, Wendel Coura-Vital, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares, Bruno Mendes Roatt, Nádia das Dores Moreira, Cláudia Martins Carneiro, Evandro Marques de Menezes Machado, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving the serodiagnosis of canineParasite epidemiology and control · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henrique Gama KerLaboratório de Pesquisas Clínicas, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Wendel Coura-Vital
Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares
Bruno Mendes Roatt
Nádia das Dores Moreira
Cláudia Martins Carneiro
Evandro Marques de Menezes Machado
Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho
Olindo Assis Martins-Filho
Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti
Márcio Sobreira Silva Araújo
Eduardo Antonio Ferraz Coelho
Denise da Silveira-Lemos
Alexandre Barbosa Reis
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a critical challenge since conventional immunoserological tests still present some deficiencies. The current study evaluated a prototype flow cytometry serology test, using antigens and fluorescent antibodies that had been stored for 1 year at 4°C, on a broad range of serum samples. Noninfected control dogs and Leishmania infantum-infected dogs were tested, and the prototype test showed excellent performance in differentiating these groups with high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy (100% in all analyses). When the CVL group was evaluated according to the dogs' clinical status, the prototype test showed outstanding accuracy in all groups with positive serology (asymptomatic II, oligosymptomatic, and symptomatic). However, in dogs which had positive results by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) but negative results by conventional serology (asymptomatic I), serological reactivity was not observed. Additionally, sera from 40 dogs immunized with different vaccines (Leishmune, Leish-Tec, or LBSap) did not present serological reactivity in the prototype test. Eighty-eight dogs infected with other pathogens (Trypanosoma cruzi, Leishmania braziliensis, Ehrlichia canis, and Babesia canis) were used to determine cross-reactivity and specificity, and the prototype test performed well, particularly in dogs infected with B. canis and E. canis (100% and 93.3% specificities, respectively). In conclusion, our data reinforce the potential of the prototype test for use as a commercial kit and highlight its outstanding performance even after storage for 1 year at 4°C. Moreover, the prototype test efficiently provided accurate CVL serodiagnosis with an absence of false-positive results in vaccinated dogs and minor cross-reactivity against other canine pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCross ReactionsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFlow CytometryLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID24108778
PMCPMC3889512
OpenAlexW2153116086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.